willard (March 13, 2012 at 1:27 pm)
I blush. Of my little experiments in dynamic, shared, crowdsourced, open, public presentation you like that one?
As cwon14 observes, a “pile of drivel of course”; and yet WSJ chose to print it.. I hardly think any amount of correction will quite expunge the drivel of it.
Everyone is welcome to try.
The prezi is shareable, can be copied and edited to one’s heart’s content.
It takes very little time to create a prezi account, seconds to copy, and however long as one wishes to tailor the presentation to whatever ends one chooses.
Have at, willard, cwon14, and whosoever wants to diverge from the limits of WordPress’ nesting structures.
And I must say, http://xkcd.com/1025/ ![:)]()
If I may, steven mosher wonders who supports any form of lying for a cause, which is funny, coming from a man who’s career is in marketing, but poignant too, in its ambiguity.
Is it intended to be read as “do you support ‘all forms of lying’ for a cause,” or “do you support any form ‘of lying for a cause’”? Or some other meaning?
Because however one answers the one question, it’s hairsplittingly tinted by a hint of the other meaning.
And really, shouldn’t the question simply be, “Have you stopped beating your fill-in-the-blank?”
For the record, I don’t support having causes in the first place personally, though I don’t mind if others profess to causes (even if only for the sake of entertainment value), so I doubt I will be able to relate to the meaning of the question, if there is one.
Which leads me to wonder why Tom believes the question so fair?
Tom, do you support any form of question for a cause?
