Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by PA

0
0

Jim D…

The US has about 30% environmental crazies. There is a major green party presence in Europe and they are sort of leftist anyway.

There are protests and riots in China over the pollution.

Domestic politics are going to limit the amount of fossil fuel consumption.

The carbon credits were sort of a disaster. They were an excuse for Europeans to do nothing and were 90% fraudulent.

We might have to disagree on this.


Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Dick Hertz

0
0

I prefer…
not to freeze to death in winter,
to have mechanized agriculture so the world has plenty of food,
to use machines to build buildings, roads, bridges and infrastructure,
to have instant on lighting in my home,
to have a world of information at my finger tips,
to be able to safely travel around the world,
to cool my home in the summer,
to have a supply of raw materials for manufacturing
to have machines that can manufacture an extraordinary amount of stuff

I would also prefer to have all these things without changing the chemical composition of the atmosphere. But the reality is that we have all these things and nobody wants to give them up. And this high standard of living that we have is based on our ability to burn fossil fuels. And at this time, there is no reasonable substitute for fossil fuels. So if you want to stop the increase in CO2 you need to work on the energy problem, so start inventing solutions.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Steven Mosher

0
0

when was the last time a republican refused to increase defense spending cause he wasn’t a general and wasnt sure about the future threats.

I’m not a general.. ya, you hear that one all the time.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Max_OK, Citizen Scientist

0
0

I never thought of science as a religion. Who is the Pope of Science? Is there a God of Science? Are there Ten Commandments of Science. Is there a Science Heaven and a Science hell? Any religious holidays for worshippers?

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by GaryM

0
0

“She is willing, however, to appear alongside politicians and pundits who flatly reject the basic tenets of climate change that she embraces.”

“Basic tenets?” Since when is the product of multiple computer models, using estimated, kriged, pseudo data a “basic tenet of climate science?”

Even if the incredibly poor temperature reports, based on sparse data, limited global coverage, and more than a,little guess work, do come close to reflecting an actual increase in “global average temperature (oh please!), that is not a “basic tenet of climate science.”

Now, CAGW is a basic tenet of progressive politics. It is a central factor in the dogma of the Church of Global Warming. It is the foundation from which western governments are seeking centralization of control over the energy economy. But “global warming”, and its poor step-brother, climate sensitivity, are at best the end products of a scientific process, not a tenet, basic or otherwise, of that science.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by PA

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by David Wojick

0
0

Smart politicians avoid detailed defense issues as carefully as detailed climate issues, or detailed economic issues. It is the climate scientists who mistakenly think they know all about policy issues.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Jim D

0
0

Dick H, you give up too easily on human ingenuity. Support their efforts. Don’t sit at the back and throw things at the ones who try.


Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by GaryM

0
0

Democrats are much better. They take pride in their ignorance.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by GaryM

0
0

Yeah, that whole climate sensitivity thing is a tea party plot.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Max_OK, Citizen Scientist

0
0

Dick fears he will be denied fossil fuels immediately and demands immediate solutions. I would be alarmed too if I thought like Dick.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by GaryM

0
0

Faustino,

I find the suggestion of a one page policy statement on an issue regarding control of the global energy economy about as helpful as a claim you can predict the future “global average temperature” of the Earth based on a calculation done on the back of an envelope.

Fake simplicity is as dangerous as fake certainty. In fact, I think they are flip sides of the same coin.

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by kim

0
0

I score.
You score.
We all score
The Ice Cores.
==========

Comment on Week in review by Max_OK, Citizen Scientist

0
0

jim2 hasn’t freed himself of an ideology that says an unfettered market is the solution to all problems. The ideology is the master and poor jim2 is the servant. As long as his master controls him, he will not be able to consider practical solutions. Free yourself, jim2. You can do it if you try.

Comment on Week in review by Max_OK, Citizen Scientist

0
0

Just eat lard. Spread it on your bread. A grilled lard sandwich is delicious.


Comment on Week in review by jim2

0
0

The Styne link is broken.

Comment on Week in review by Max_OK, Citizen Scientist

0
0

kim, I would comment on that if knew what it meant.

Comment on Week in review by John Smith (it's my real name)

0
0

twice that graph has appeared
I have tough time seeing something I should be afraid of
and 90 year data set with little green line that runs slightly up
what if went slightly down
the green line looks like statistical BS to me
good luck making it flat

Comment on Week in review by Don Monfort

0
0

Well, this crap is nothing but a disingenuous, gratuitous insult. JC SNIP?

Comment on Georgia politicians cool to global warming by Joseph

0
0
<blockquote>Socialist Obama’s “healthcare” system does suck. </blockquote> Oh no.. Jim you do realize that Obamacare is essentially the same plan that was proposed by <b>conservative</b> Heritage Foundation? A more socialized system would really be one like Great Britain's where the government runs the system, followed by single payer systems, and then by the public option which involved the government providing it's own plan on the healthcare exchange. The public option was rejected before the bill was passed. Obamacare has more to do with providing more help to poor and lower middle income people to make insurance more affordable and regulating the health insurance markets. And if you think "subsidies" are examples of Socialism then I you must think the mortgage and charitable deductions are also examples of Socialism .
Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images