Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 147842 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on NARUC Panel Discussion on Climate Change by Mike Flynn

0
0

Eric,

My apologies. You are correct. A decade has not passed since 2007.

As the Earth cannot warm due to any amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, my wager is still on offer, if you care to avail yourself.

Four and a half billion years of history shows that a large molten ball of rock in space has cooled. The interior is still molten, so it continues to cool, paranormal physics of the climatological variety notwithstanding.

Live well and prosper,

Mike Flynn.


Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Curious George

0
0

I am worried about something else. The United States was founded on a principle of freedom. Our forefathers disobeyed The King. Is it a crime to disobey The President? His(?) website http://www.barackobama.com surely suggests that you can be paraded in streets for that crime – actually, not for disobeying, merely for disagreeing. That the attack against Prof. Curry, Prof. Pielke and others followed within days may be a coincidence or a coordination. We should ask a conspiracy expert Prof. Lewandowski to resolve it.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Mike Flynn

0
0

This is what happens when you put beauty contest winners in charge of a country. The results tend to be far less pretty than the contestants.

Live well and prosper,

Mike Flynn.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Skiphil

0
0

re:

” it has been open season on those who express alignment with “the consensus” for years.”

Joshua, can’t you detect the vast imbalance and asymmetry between Davids questioning the Goliath of monolithic “consensus” vs. the Empire pounding down the handful of critics?

A few powerless critics sounding off on a handful of blogs is radically different from the consensus people in POWER seeking to stamp out all remaining independent thought.

Speak truth to POWER, Joshua. Try getting “your” side to show a little bit of tolerance for differing views. That is what this is really all about, whether or not the demagogues can allow the existence of just a few independent thinkers.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by omanuel

0
0

Thanks for exposing the global links of politicians that believe trace levels of CO2 in air have greater influence on changes in Earth’s weather than does the pulsar remains of a supernova (1 AU away) that made every atom in the solar system.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by craigm350

0
0
Reblogged this on <a href="https://weatheraction.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/conflicts-of-interest-in-climate-science/" rel="nofollow">the WeatherAction News Blog</a> and commented: A very thoughtful take on the Climate Inquisition.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Skiphil

0
0

NOTICE this: what the Congressman did not do is announce that all past and future witnesses would be evaluated for possible conflicts of interest. He only picked on a select handful of independent thinkers who do not toe the line in some way. What makes it obvious that this is a witch-hunt trolling for anything to use against its targets is the lack of balance and lack of comprehensive standards. This is purely a biased fishing expedition….

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Skiphil

0
0

I don’t think you mean Eugene McCarthy….


Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Skiphil

0
0

meant to place this comment here:

NOTICE this: what the Congressman did not do is announce that all past and future witnesses would be evaluated for possible conflicts of interest. He only picked on a select handful of independent thinkers who do not toe the line in some way. He only picked on people he wants to squelch. What makes it obvious that this is a witch-hunt trolling for anything to use against its targets is the lack of balance and lack of comprehensive standards. This is purely a biased, malicious fishing expedition….

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Joshua

0
0

No Lucifer – I didn’t miss it.

But I don’t see how that justifies your red-baiting.

But it is rather hilarious that Judith finds your red-baiting acceptable but that my speaking to it isn’t acceptable.

Now that’s ironic!

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Nick Stokes

0
0

“The only similarity was asking for a list of ALL funding.”
Well, yes. All you’re saying is that Barton demanded the same and then a whole lot more. Directed at the scientists themselves.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by beththeserf

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Pasta8Fazool

0
0

“Grijalva wrote: ‘Companies with a direct financial interest in climate and air quality standards are funding environmental research that influences state and federal regulations and shapes public understanding of climate science. These conflicts should be clear to stakeholders, including policymakers who use scientific information to make decisions. My colleagues and I cannot perform our duties if research or testimony provided to us is influenced by undisclosed financial relationships.’”

It would have been better as: “Companies, government personnel and agencies with a direct financial interest in employment, salaries, advancement and political policy (including climate and air quality standards) are funding environmental research that influences state and federal regulations and shapes public understanding of climate science. These conflicts should be clear to stakeholders, including the public (citizens), policymakers who use scientific information to make decisions or must pay for the consequences. My colleagues and I cannot perform our duties if research or testimony provided to us is influenced by undisclosed financial relationships.”

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Pooh, Dixie

0
0

As reads: “… duties if research or testimony provided to us is influenced by undisclosed financial relationships”
Amend to read: “duties.”

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Pooh, Dixie

0
0

Heaven forfend that they would engage in such despicable practice!!! Outside Chicago, that is.


Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by ianl8888

0
0

> … don’t like the policy implications that go along with acknowledging climate change

And you’ve disconnected from the power grid, have you ?

Living the green dream ?

Please, no arm-waving reply

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Wagathon

0
0

There’s not a snowball’s chance in hell Chicago will ever go Republican. Oh wait — it looks like hell may have frozen over…

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Curious George

0
0

Don’t think. Act.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by beththeserf

0
0

I’ve got me a list and you’re
on the list. I’ll dig up the dirt
to unearth me some evidence
link you to Big Effervescence
with a view to evanescence
of the Seven’s magnificance
and testmonial significance.

Think that about covers it.

Comment on Conflicts of interest in climate science by Mark Silbert

Viewing all 147842 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images