Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Don Monfort


Comment on The stupid party by Stephen Segrest

0
0

I’m still trying to break-down pieces parts of the term “natural variability”. I’ll continue to use an El Nino as an example. During the modern climate record, we’ve had X number of El Ninos. Is there anything in the statistics of Climate History that El Ninos are either (A) increasing in frequency (number) or (B) increasing in intensity (i.e., 1998)? Or another way of saying this — any clear fingerprint of “something” happening on “natural variability”?Thanks.

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Salvatore Del Prete

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by beththeserf

Comment on Climate sensitivity: lopping off the fat tail by Berényi Péter

0
0

Drexler’s prediction was some time maybe in the next decade for the first assembler

The task is obviously difficult. But it is not impossible, there is nothing in physics that could rule out the possibility of programmable self replicating molecular robots.

In fact we have an entire biosphere as a proof-of-concept entity to demonstrate its feasibility.

Comment on The stupid party by Stephen Segrest

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Willard

0
0

Non grid map:

“Though our investigation is still ongoing, it appears the North Carolina General Assembly may have inadvertently wiped out all local and federal boundaries while redrawing the state’s already heavily manipulated fourth congressional district late last night,” said White House press secretary Josh Earnest, addressing the millions of panicked Americans now living in flux and untethered to any known county, city ward, rural township, or municipal water district. […] Earnest went on to acknowledge that despite the ensuing chaos, the massive upheaval of district lines will likely prove advantageous to incumbent electoral candidates.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/gerrymandering-mishap-leaves-nation-without-any-bo,38296/

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Skiphil


Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Neville.

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by lolwot

0
0

Mann realized Jaime wasn’t acting in good faith and so deleted him.

Comment on The stupid party by Danny Thomas

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Curious George

0
0

Danny, congratulations. A great catch. Another attempt to redefine things – the Gulf Stream, in this case. Nothing is immune to Progress!

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Wagathon

0
0

Mann has put up an easily debunked conjecture all while pointing at the ‘hockey stick’ data to justify his conclusion. What we may be seeing is Mr. Mann putting his thumb in the eye of everyone who participated in the charade by putting their reputations behind supporting his work all of these years. Perhaps this is his way of coming clean –e.g., owning-up to the fraud, admitting global warming is nothing but a hoax and a scare tactic and apologizing for the hoodwink, diminishing the credibility of science and wasting the country’s scarce resources.

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Skiphil

0
0

Is there no disgrace by the CLImate Establishment that you will not slavishly defend? You have no idea whether she was not acting in good faith — her comments certainly look serious and well formulated. Mann’s idea of “not in good faith” is anything that might challenge or embarrass him.

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by ordvic


Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Danny Thomas

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by lolwot

0
0

“Anthony Watts has an extensive critique of the paper, pointing to a 2014 paper by oceanographer Thomas Rossby: On the long-term stability of Gulf Stream transport based on 20 years of direct measurements.”

And yet

“The Rossby paper is not that relevant to our paper because it deals with much shorter time scales (20 years of data, while we use decadally smoothed data over 1100 years) and with the Gulf Stream rather than the AMOC. Actually for those 20 years analysed by Rossby our index shows an increase in the AMOC – but that is so small that it would be within the uncertainties of Rossby’s calculated trend in the Gulf Stream. So no inconsistency there.” – Stefan Rahmstorf

OH DEAR has Dr Curry just been caught jumping to a conclusion based on the TITLE of a paper? and citing Anthony Watts as a source of all things?

“The title pretty much speaks for itself,”

Wow what careful scientist Dr Curry is. The title speaks for itself indeed!

Comment on The stupid party by climatereason

0
0

Here is the 1930 us weather review about the gulf stream warming at the time

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/058/mwr-058-03-0103.pdf

On Page 106 item VI it is mentioned that a report is to be compiled giving gulf stream temperatures back to the earliest times. it warms and cools.

Anyone ever come across this document as this would illustrate whether today is out of the ordinary.

Maury also compiled useful information on the gulf stream as did the Challenger expedition over 120 years ago.

It is not necessary to use mannian proxies . Reconstructions back 1100 Years ago. Hmmm. Surely not even Jimd would attempt to defend that nonsense.would you Jim?

Tonyb

Comment on The stupid party by Michael Cunningham

Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by beththeserf

0
0

Any excuse to hide a critique will do the trick.
Say lets not bend over backwards, Feynman style,
to critically examine flaws in our work, (Yamal
sampling ) or statistical method, ( temperature
splicing) Good faith yer say?

Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images