The fact he took a screenshot demonstrates what he was up to. Mann sniffed him out. Clever man.
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by lolwot
↧
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by ristvan
Danny, your discoveries are worthy of a guest post here. Welcome to the crowd! I do hope my most recent book may have helped a bit with your enlightenment. Lead on.
↧
Comment on The stupid party by Peter Lang
To credit Obama with the expansion of fracking and not credit Bush and Cheney would be an example of stupid. Both Bush and Cheney had a background in the oil industry. They understood waht the industry needed to unleash the enormous capabilities to innovate and progress. They understood what the industrry needed – definitely not subsidies or more regulations. They needed freeing up of particular constraints. Bush and Cheyney unsderstood what was relevant andf important. In all these things you have to give and take to satisfy many different special interest groups – especially the loony Left and the eco-warriors. They whAt was important to achieve and focused on that and gave ground on many thigs that were not important for making genuine progress. They succeeded mightily! Give credit.
Obama on the other hand has been blockig progress on everything. He’s done enormous damage to the USA and the world. He’s definitely the worst – the stupidest – US president in my lifetime. What a walking disaster!
BTW, Thank you to Richard Tol for pointing out how gullible Obama and his team of advisers are by believing the 97% of climate scientists … nonsense. Another example of his stupidity
↧
Comment on The stupid party by mosomoso
Then there’s the Fairfax press, publisher of the Age. It exists to make even the Guardian look adult.
What’s funny is that, though we Australians are saturated daily (at our own cost in the case of the ABC) with this New Class/Posh Left media slop, there are still people who want to point it out to us – as if we could miss it!
↧
Comment on The stupid party by Danny Thomas
TonyB,
History? Here, let me just adjust that for ya……………..there, that’s better.
↧
↧
Comment on The stupid party by Peter Lang
I note you are still trolling DS.
And continually display your obstinancy and ignorance – and stupid beliefs – on nuclear energy.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by lolwot
So you think Greenland shrinks to 0 mass every September?
THINK for christ sake
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by jim2
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by beththeserf
Sometimes when dealing with tricky man it’s best ter
document, like in transactions, signatures on the dotted
line. Speaking of signatures, I hear the CO2 fingerprint
fer man made warming is missing in the troposphere
and CO 2 is free ter go.
↧
↧
Comment on The stupid party by blueice2hotsea
attp-
<i>"It took Feynman to work out why, though."</i>
<a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2007/01/remembering-the-mistakes-of-challenger/" rel="nofollow">Not really.</a> "The entire Thiokol [O-ring task force] group recommended no launch."
Feynman only confirmed what engineers already knew <i>before the launch</i>.
As I recall, a day or so after the Challenger disaster NPR interviewed at least one engineer who had stayed home launch-day, knowing it was going to explode. He described the catastrophe as a management failure to delay the launch - despite being warned that o-rings would burn through if launch temps were less than 28 degrees. It was 18 degrees.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by richardswarthout
Lolwot
You are to be admired. Mann et al are on the Green Mile, yet you stand by them.
Richard
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Danny Thomas
Rud,
Not even close but thanks for quite kind words. I’ve come here due to discomfort with seeing and hearing differently than some seem to and due to the lack of understanding so much have to assume that the issue lies with me. So many on both sides have shared so much allowing me to know to look a bit more deeply and as a result I find I’m still seeing and hearing differently than some (there’s circular logic, eh?). At this point, it’s damnedifIknow. Progress has gone from firmly in the middle to, well, firmly in the middle.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by climatereason
Danny
It’s catastrophic climate change, not just run of the mill climate change. It must be true as I heard the phrase on the BBC less than an hour ago.
It will get steadily worse in the run up to Paris. By then it will be unbelievably awful climate change.
Tonyb
Tonyb
↧
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Danny Thomas
TonyB,
“it must be true as I heard the phrase on the BBC less than an hour ago.”
Try changing the channel (not the big English one as who knows where that would lead) and I’d guess you’d find a differing report.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by lolwot
Sunspot <i>integral</i>?
Let me guess. Sunspots don't correlate with global temperature so they needed <b>adjusting</b>. But of course it's fine because there's <b>absolutely no justification for using the integral other than to get a fit</b>
I note the record hot year of 2014 is absent on the graph too.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by climatereason
Repeated as posted in wrong thread.
Here is the 1930 us weather review about the gulf stream warming at the time
http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/058/mwr-058-03-0103.pdf
On Page 106 item VI it is mentioned that a report is to be compiled giving gulf stream temperatures back to the earliest times. it warms and cools.
Anyone ever come across this document as this would illustrate whether today is out of the ordinary.
Maury also compiled useful information on the gulf stream as did the Challenger expedition over 120 years ago.
It is not necessary to use mannian proxies . Reconstructions back 1100 Years.. Hmmm. Surely not even Jimd would attempt to defend that nonsense.would you Jim?
tonyb
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Salvatore Del Prete
Global SST+AMO:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-amo/from:1880/mean:13/detrend:-0.6/offset:-0.4/plot/hadsst3gl/from:1880/mean:13
Ulric , your data is convincing but there is one unknown and that is during most of the time period your data covers the sun has been in an active to very active regular rhythmic cyclic mode of activity. Only since post 2005 has the sun entered a deep phase of inactivity and this was still punctuated by a recent solar maximum period of activity. What happens during a protracted solar minimum period of activity with very little rhythmic cyclic activity?
I am confident that if sunspot numbers fall below the value of 40 on a regular basis that sea surface temperatures for the globe are going to decrease due to the fact Visible Light/Long Wave UV light will be on the decrease which penetrate the ocean surface to great depths.This despite the phase of the AMO which is all relative to what the average sea surface temperatures for the globe are in the first place.
Where we differ Ulric, is I maintain the ultimate determination of global sea surface temperatures is solar activity ,not the AMO. The AMO is superimposed upon what ever that average global sea surface temperature happens to be as determined by long term solar activity. The AMO then making the sea surface temperature deviate from that average but not controlling the ultimate average global sea surface temperature.
I still agree with you ,other then I think what you say is superimposed upon the determination of what the global average sea surface temperatures are in response to long term solar activity when in a very active or very inactive phase.
I hope I have expressed this well.
↧
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by mosomoso
I’m sure the climate and the thermohaline circulation are changing in all sort of major and minor lines and cycles. What else could they do?
But there is a positive change we ourselves can make today. We can reject the Washington Post, on the grounds that is for big babies.
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by ristvan
Don, got Brandon’s back a bit on this. One reason why I have been posting so proliferously on this awful paper on multiple blogs. Almost better than a subpoena’d deposition. (Did my last one of those just three months ago.) Indelible. And notice the non ‘facts’ crafted in always.
Now, never used the word fraud. Have used, and will repeat, probable academic misconduct in this paper, in multiple ways. In their world, worse. And have posted irrefutable evidence as to why that assertion must be true. misrepresentarion of F 6. Failure to cite other recent papers. Failure to cite critiques of their prior work relied upon…
↧
Comment on Whats up with the Atlantic? by Salvatore Del Prete
lolwot I do not understand your point. The data simply shows how the Greenland Ice Cap has varied on a yearly and seasonal basis for the past few years.
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
