Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by ordvic

0
0

It sounds like Gavin Schmidt is repressing a lot of anger.


Comment on Which climate change papers ‘matter’? by Vaughan Pratt

0
0

@PA: Well, no.

Your following remarks looked very reasonable, PA, but what was your “well, no” in response to?

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by micro6500

0
0

It’s possible, just that the words alone are usually not enough to tell.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by Bad Andrew

0
0

“Right now you are dumping C02 into MY FRICKING AIR.”

Oooh, ALL CAPS ARE SCARY. lol

Andrew

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by AK

0
0
<blockquote>The word use was “damage,” not CO2. Is there a technology to undo the damage too?</blockquote>I repeat my question: what “<i>damage from unchecked emissions growth</i>”?<blockquote>I am prepared to evolve. Are you?</blockquote>Yes! We don't need to wait for genes. We have <b>brains!</b>

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by rogerknights

0
0

China is converting coal in Inner Mongolia into city gas and piping it to power plants near cities, to reduce particulate emission. The coal to gas conversion emits a lot more CO2 than burning it would. But maybe, because coal use in power plants is declining, it appears incorrectly that CO2 emissions from coal are going down.

Well, we’ll know for sure once the new satellite that can measure CO2 emissions regardless of source starts posting its data.

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by AK

0
0
And yes, Willard, before you ask, I know <b>exactly</b> what truth about myself I've exposed with that statement.

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by micro6500

0
0

” Claiming that the injection of fossil carbon is “irreversible” is untrue, and they know it.”
Somewhere along the way, sure someone does, l1ers, opportunist, saviors, profiteers some many of them depending on the time of day, I am coming to the conclusion that the data doesn’t show any warming, just it moving around and showing up in the thermometers, I am thinking of my grandkids, I don’t want these jackholes tanking modern society.


Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by micro6500

0
0

” Where is the proof”
There’s warming from a lack of cooling, because the only measurements don’t show any.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by Jim D

0
0

matthewmarler, which of the premises do you think has not been expounded multiple times on even this site?
1. That scientists succumb to peer pressure to write papers on AGW and not write against it.
2. That they only care about funding, so they promote AGW to get that.
I won’t even ask you to go to WUWT, Monckton and right-wing radio, who, of course, go much further and divine that a ‘world government’ is coming out of the IPCC process. Lewandowsky seems to have been right about those people.
No, the meme that the scientists don’t really believe AGW and have these ulterior motives of peer pressure or money is a false one. The scientific evidence from multiple lines is plain which is why there are so many who feel so strongly about it. It is as simple to explain as that. Skeptics have a hard time with majority scientific views and seek ways to explain it to themselves, and this is what they use as a means of comfort among themselves.

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by willard (@nevaudit)

0
0

> what “damage from unchecked emissions growth”?

Is this rhetorical question yet another instance of the single proof fallacy, just an impossible demand of futurological evidence, or simply a misreading of “once”?

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by Danny Thomas

Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by willard (@nevaudit)

0
0

> I am thinking of my grandkids, I don’t want these jackholes tanking modern society.

Don’t be such an alarmist, Micro.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by willard (@nevaudit)

0
0

> That scientists succumb to peer pressure to write papers on AGW and not write against it.

That’s not it at all, Jim D. It’s about having your ego wrapped up in having your research influence policy, being a frustrated policy advocate, keeping ‘score’ in a personal war against skeptics, seeking fame, generating book sales and lecture fees and political influence, etc.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by stevefitzpatrick

0
0

I suspect the humor in all the melodrama is lost on the weeping climate scientists. Fortunately, the silliness of it all is appreciated by lots of people. James ‘west-side-highway’ Hansen has quite sensibly retired; maybe all those very upset weeping climate scientists should consider a similar path. Or maybe they could all move to coastal Greenland and form their own town…. It would never be too hot there; and there’d be no skeptics to argue with.


Comment on A key admission regarding climate memes by AK

0
0
<blockquote>Is this rhetorical question yet another instance of the single proof fallacy, just an impossible demand of futurological evidence, or simply a misreading of “once”?</blockquote>None of the above. Rather than make you ask another question, I'll go on: AFAIK nobody has demonstrated any “<i>damage from unchecked emissions growth</i>”. It's all vague and tacit: in the cloud. The only real “<i>damage</i>” that anybody has claimed, AFAIK, is increased pCO2. What are you talking about?

Comment on Week in review – science edition by popesclimatetheory

0
0

12 tools for communicating climate change more effectively [link]

Or better, you could call this 12 tools for brainwashing people to believe the alarmism so that they can better be frightened, controlled and taxed.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by Jim D

0
0

willard, I don’t think that skeptics think that those types (Mann, Hansen, etc.) are pressured into believing AGW, so I was just limiting it to the type of thinking that I was surprised Matthew had not come across here.

Comment on Pre-traumatic stress syndrome: climate scientists speak out by angech2014

0
0

Have you sought help?

Comment on Week in review – science edition by popesclimatetheory

0
0

That’s a blow to scientists working on their groundbreaking study into upper-atmospheric wave patterns over the Atlantic. But it’s also a challenge to politicians, business leaders and civil society campaigners who take this issue seriously. – See more at: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/08/15/communicating-climate-change-without-the-scary-monsters/#sthash.ykh7MRZH.dpuf

They have a really big problem. How do they scare us when the scarey things they tell us are not really happening? They say the models tell us the scarey things will happen, they are supposed to be happening already, but trust us, they will happen, someday.

Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images