Brandon S? (@Corpus_no_Logos): In another case, Steyn wrote an article in which he said nobody had ever compared Michael Mann to a child molester.
I put up the exact quote elsewhere in this discussion. The phrase “except for …” makes clear that it is not a “comparison”. Others have quoted the editorial at greater length. The use of “Sandusky” and “Mann” in the same sentence draws attention to the incompetence and venality of the Penn State committed that “investigated” and “exonerated” the two men.
Everyone knows now that the investigation of Sandusky was a travesty; does not the investigation of Mann by the same people likewise require a re-investigation by an independent agent (e.g. a federal district attorney v via a grand jury)?
