willard (@nevaudit) | September 13, 2015 at 7:10 pm |
I withheld that it is absurd to claim that Karl Popper spent extremely much effort to develop, publish and argue for a method he sincerely meant did not exist.
Your quote is taken from the following section:
“So much about the non-existence of subjects in general. But Scientific Method holds a somewhat peculiar position in being even less existed than some other non-existen subjects.”
Karl Popper clarified exactly what he meant in the next sections. Sections which you, by unknown reasons, did not refer to, quote or draw any attention to:
What I mean is this ….
( See my reply at | September 13, 2015 at 5:26 pm | for the rest of this section)
“I assert that no scientific method exists in any of these three senses. to put it in a more direct way:
(1) There is no method of discovering a scientific theory.
(2) There is no method of ascertaining the truth of a scientific hypothesis, that is, no method of verification.
(3) There is no method of ascertaining wether a hypothesis is «probable», in the sense of the probability calculus.”
Karl Popper´s empirical method provides none of these 3 points.
Still it is a very valuable scientific method.