Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Pink flamingos versus black swans by Joseph

0
0
<blockquote>You really shouldn’t comment about stuff you are clueless on.</blockquote> I it is probably bloated. Now you come along and seem <b>certain</b> it is not bloated. So maybe you can explain why we must be spending the amount we are spending for national defense. I didn't say we shouldn't be spending far more than our closest competitor to maintain our industrial base. But what is exactly the right amount to do that? That's my question.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by scotts4sf

0
0

Doug,
Most now use UHI and RSS data. The NOAA and NASA adjustments have corrupted the historical record. Interesting to see what Dr R. Pielke Sr and the others come up with when they review the basis for adjustments.

In Australia, Dr Mahorrsey presented Ruthigan and a couple series temps which showed adjustments turning cooling trends to !.6*C heating over historical records. So we have to move back to actual observations and provide a written basis for projected changes in the past.

ARGO ;and SST temperatures are being adjusted furiously in the run up to Paris. All we can hope for is a LIA 2 to convince the public that something is rotten in Denmark. or Paris.

Scott

Comment on Pink flamingos versus black swans by Joseph

0
0

What happens when the President wants to send a carrier to the latest hot spot and they are already deployed or back in port

What “hot spot” did you have in mind? Can outline a current plausible scenario for this “hot spot?”

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Gareth

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Bob Ryan (@BobRyanCCM)

0
0

Spencer Weart is a wonderful writer/science historian. Good read is also “Money for Keeling:Monitoring CO2 Levels” https://www.aip.org/history/climate/Kfunds.htm
At the end he writes: “Mingled with this infighting came another trend: the politicization of some scientific decisions. . . . Such strong politicization did not appear in other advanced democracies. It appears to correlate with the unequalled rise to power in America of right-wing anti-intellectual, anti-elite attitudes. While increased bureaucratization of research support may be inevitable, interference for political ends is an error that should and can be opposed by all citizens.”

Comment on Pink flamingos versus black swans by matthewrmarler

0
0

Joseph: So you can recognize it, but those who actually understand the science in-depth, can’t see it for what it is? Are they making it up?

That is a good pair of questions. Why are some of the experts spreading “alarm” (a call to immediate and profound redirection of the energy economy), when the evidence is slim to none that much bad will happen, and there is no evidence that anything bad has happened because of increased CO2? And why do they continue unabated when so many of their dire forecasts to date have been so inaccurate?

Comment on Pink flamingos versus black swans by Joseph

0
0

when the evidence is slim to none that much bad will happen, and there is no evidence that anything bad has happened because of increased CO2

Why do you say “some experts?” What makes you think that most scientist don’t consider climate change to have negative risks? How do you know there slim evidence? Another you just another non-expert pontificating about the science you really don’t know that well?

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Steven Mosher

0
0

Rud forgets that data has no trend.
Models of data have trends


Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Steven Mosher

0
0

Let me know when you get your Nobel.
I won’t wait

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Steven Mosher

0
0

Weather is another word for stuff that you can’t understand. Climate you can understand. Weather is what’s left over

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by davideisenstadt

0
0

Yeah mosh..let me know when you get a bachelors in math, or an applied science.
theres that too.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by JCH

0
0

NOAA provides high quality products that are made highly dedicated and exceedingly competent scientists.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Mark Silbert

0
0

Got it. Good point.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Arch Stanton

0
0

The butler had the body but he disposed of it somehow. Any further questions?

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Stanton Brown

0
0

Your religious faith is admirable. Or would be if you didn’t want to impose it on others.


Comment on A peculiar kind of science by Stanton Brown

0
0

Weart is obviously an extreme left-winger politically who has let his politics affect his judgment.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by JCH

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by climatereason

0
0

Hot, where? In some places but certainly not in others

Tonyb

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by JCH

0
0

tonyb – irrelevant, and bazaar.

Comment on A peculiar kind of science by JCH

0
0

You are the one with the religion which you want to impose… the church of it’s not happening, or if it is, it’s all going to be good. Sounds like blind faith because it is blind faith. Pray for the AMO and the stadium wave, but hope for the Kimikamikaze wind. It’s at least real.

Viewing all 147818 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images