Two celebrated standard bearers of scientific skepticism today, Freeman Dyson and William Happer, weighed-in giving their views about the motives and plain ignorance of global warming alarmists. “There are people who just need a cause that’s bigger than themselves,” Happer observed. “Then they can feel virtuous and say other people are not virtuous.” Going to the matter of competence, Dyson was no less sparing of <em>brainwashed</em> climate scientists. “The models are extremely oversimplified,” says Dyson. “They don’t represent the clouds in detail at all. They simply use a fudge factor to represent the clouds.” (<a href="http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2013/04/climatologists_are_no_einstein.html" rel="nofollow">See--e.g., Climatologists are no Einsteins, says his successor</a>)
Dyson worked with Einstein -- he replaced Einstein -- and knows a little something about what we do and do not understand. Dyson just does not believe climatologists "understand the climate," and says, "their computer models are full of fudge factors." Dyson also says, "I think any good scientist ought to be a skeptic."
"It was similar in the Soviet Union," Dyson observed. "Who could doubt Marxist economics was the future?"