Michael, there was a reference to this by Judith et al earlier this year, when her post was advertised.
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Faustino
↧
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by barn E. rubble
RE:Thomas Lee Elifritz | February 23, 2014 at 4:07 pm
“Deep Climate has already made you look like the fool . . .”
Well, if Deep Climate is all you read and your only source for information you’re not only a fool but a tool. And I mean that in a nice way.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Robert I Ellison
Clouds change with changing atmospheric and ocean circulation. They are a most important part of the climate system – determining the largest part of the variability of the energy budget of the planet in recent times.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by David Springer
Michael’s real name is Hugh Jass. He suffered a lot in school because of it hence the attitude today. He graduates this summer (maybe, if he can bring up his failing grades) so the torment will be over hopefully.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by WebHubTelescope (@WHUT)
Finally a topic fit for a GaryM.
I bow out when the lawyers appear.
↧
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by David Springer
GaryM is a legal beagle too if I’m not mistaken.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by barn E. rubble
RE: Michael (Mickey the M.)
“That Mike M is a renowned scientist contributing to our understadning of the world, and Mike F aint and doesn’t.”
Speaking of the delusional . . . I don’t think Mickey has been, “contributing to our understadning of the world” much either. Or spelling for that matter. Perhaps quoting verbatim never helps these guys . . . could also explain why Mike M. doesn’t quote verbatim?
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Michael
Devastated, but getting over it.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by freeHat
I’m much more aligned with MS – in politics thru climate, but in observing what they write about people they’re in disagreement with, I can’t help thinking they deserve each other on some level.
↧
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Michael
“Nutty Michael?” – tallbloke
Yes, nutty.
Have you read it? – he must have been drunk when he wrote parts of it.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Michael
Good to see that Bob has great faith in the high accuracy of climate proxies.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by tallbloke
“Have you read it” – Michael
I have. It’s much more entertaining than the usual lawyerspeak. Everyone in America loves to wax large about the right to free speech don’t they? And rightly so, it’s an important element of the constitution.
Shutting down a journal because some scientists say something that disagrees with IPCC dogma, or suing someone because you’re too thin skinned to shrug off an attack on someone’s scientific output using ugly rhetoric is just anti-scientific and anti-liberty control freakery.
Anyway, what’s your comment on Mann’s doctoring of quotes from the Muir Russel Inquiry? Or are you going to avert your eyes from this self serving misrepresentation?
↧
Comment on Week in review by Paul S
angech,
Most of the things to which you refer are independently observed: stratospheric aerosol increases, changes to trade winds, warming of the oceans below 700m, strong warming in the Arctic. Being independently observed means their existence, assuming the observations are correct, doesn’t rely on any external theory or any other observations. Therefore your insistence that all of these things can’t be happening at the same time doesn’t work – we can see them happening at the same time.
↧
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Robert I Ellison
Go away micky – you bore me.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Robert I Ellison
Actually – let’s consider paleoclimate.
‘Now imagine that you have never seen the device and that it is hidden in a box in a dark room. You have no knowledge of the hand that occasionally sets things in motion, and you are trying to figure out the system’s behavior on the basis of some old 78-rpm recordings of the muffled sounds made by the device. Plus, the recordings are badly scratched, so some of what was recorded is lost or garbled beyond recognition. If you can imagine this, you have some appreciation of the difficulties of paleoclimate research and of predicting the results of abrupt changes in the climate system.’ op. eit.
But ENSO for instance has quite good Holocene spanning proxies. And of course modern climate shifts are far more certain.
e.g. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00626.1
What we have instead of comprehension from Michael – that is the hard biyt obviously – instead is the epitome of the poorly informed noisily insulting, berating and belittling. It is just another pointless distraction from the reality of climate and climate policy. Ultimately – he is part of the problem and not part of the solution.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by kim
Whatcha wanna do, is look at paleoclimate cross-eyed.
================
↧
Comment on Week in review by kim
Causation, sigh. Attribution, ack.
============
↧
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by kim
Just bring out the facts, Mac,
Investigate on the rack,
‘Exonerate’ that hack,
And don’t you look back.
===============
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by Latimer Alder
Mikey get his bluff called Down Under ..and caves
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2014/2/25/blustering-bully-backs-off.html
He really is a very foolish little Mann.
↧
Comment on Steyn et al. versus Mann by kim
The Money Mann doesn’t just talk, he tortures feasibility.
==============
↧
