Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 148479 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by jim2

$
0
0


That said, it is not just Chinese solar arrays that are failing—the defective panels installed on the Los Angeles area warehouse were made by an American manufacturer. Furthermore, all solar panels degrade and gradually generate less electricity over time.

The German solar monitoring firm, Meteocontrol, found that 80 percent of the 30,00 solar installations it reviewed in Europe were underperforming. Enertis Solar tested solar panels from 6 manufacturers at two power plants in Spain and found rates of malfunctioning as high as 34.5 percent. An inspection of a solar plant in Britain found that 12 percent of its Chinese modules failed. In the United States, an American solar manufacturer, First Solar, budgeted $271.2 million to replace defective modules it manufactured in 2008 and 2009.

http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/04/20/solar-panel-degradation/


Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Jim D

$
0
0

Does that explain why the fire season is getting longer too?

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by jim2

$
0
0


2013 was one of the quietest wildfire years in U.S. history, according to objective data from the federal government’s National Interagency Fire Center. The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number – and it certainly gives global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading global warming claims – but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s. Importantly, the Earth was in a cooling phase during the 1960s and 1970s when so many more wildfires occurred.

The unusually quiet 2013 fire season continued a long-term trend in declining wildfires. From 1962 through 1982, for example, at least 100,000 wildfires occurred in the United States every year. Since 1982, however, not a single year has registered 100,000 wildfires. During the past decade, an average of 73,000 wildfires occurred each year. During the 1970s, by contrast, an average of 155,000 wildfires occurred each year.

The 2014 wildfire season, moreover, has been relatively quiet so far. The total number of wildfires is well below the 1962-2013 average, and is even below the average for the past decade. Even so, the below-average 22,000 wildfires so far this year give global warming alarmists plenty of opportunities to mislead the public about the scientific facts.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2014/05/21/sorry-jerry-brown-global-warming-is-reducing-wildfires/

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Ragnaar

$
0
0

A Wreck, a Scourge, a Culture, a Mews, a Coalition, a Clattering, a Clash, a Convocation, a Cloud, a Charm, a Confusion, an Army, a Company, a Clutter, an Ascension, a Mischief, a Watch, a Huddle, a Rumba…of Models.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by kim

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Rob Ellison

$
0
0

If they want grid connection – they need to pay for grid costs pro-rata and not on the basis of energy purchased. Otherwise costs are unfairly imposed on a smaller pool of people without solar power. Which was the point of the first link. If they don’t want grid connection – so be it.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by A fan of *MORE* discourse

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by jim2


Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by jim2

$
0
0

It absolutely makes sense for all grid denizens to pay their share.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Joseph

Comment on Role of Atlantic warming(?) in recent climate shifts by steven

$
0
0

Well, what you say doesn’t match up well with the litereature on the topic but I’ll keep in mind your hypothesis should things turn out differently than most expect. I would make one comment regarding your Tisdale chart. To me it looks like you are using the detrending data. That may separate out the AMO or it may not. It sort of depends on if there has been a trend in the maximum and minimum of the AMO. Reconstructions of the AMO do not show a consistent pattern in that manner. The actual statement that ocean heat content in the North Atlantic had been dropping before 1995 is incorrect regardless.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Jim D

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Rob Ellison

$
0
0

Climate sensitivity is a nonsense concept – not applicable to a multiply coupled system that shifts because of an internal reorganisation of components every few decades. This is what science says – and I quote enough of it to demonstrate that. .

Failure to comprehend is merely one of the examples of cognitive dissonance in a movement that is overwhelmingly extreme fringe liberal. It goes well beyond science into a social movement with narratives and gatekeepers.

It leads to distorted science – and the inability to process effectively dissonant ideas in science.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by AK

$
0
0

Climate sensitivity is a nonsense concept

I’ve repeatedly called it a myth. Welcome to the club.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by beththeserf

$
0
0

u win kim)
JimD
A clammering of Alarmists.


Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Ragnaar

$
0
0

It’s an accepted point of view that more acres burned might be helping the ecosystem as compared to suppressing fire. So what the graphs may show is less interference with nature by man in the recent past meaning more acres burned recently. Fire may be positively correlated with a healthy ecosystem.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Ragnaar

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Stephen Segrest

$
0
0

Hi Captdallas — But you can buy ethanol free gas:
http://pure-gas.org/

Your argument is that if the Renewable Fuel Standard was eliminated (which would require the EPA to re-institute a gazillion specific oxygenate regs which the RFS eliminated to give national refiners greater flexibility) that more ethanol free (E-0) would be made.

Its this logic I’m balking at.

Let’s eliminate ethanol from the face of the planet, and for discussion purposes lets even forget about the oxygenate (cleaner air) aspect. Refiners need to get from 84 octane to 87 octane with “something”.

This “something” are alkylates, aromatics and reformates — which have been trading on commodity markets about $1.20 more per gallon than ethanol (last time I checked N.Y. Harbor prices).

Why would a gasoline Refiner “switch” to a higher cost octane source to get from 84 (unblended gas) to the needed 87 octane requirements?

Educate me! I’m open to listening to you.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by Stephen Segrest

$
0
0

stevepostrel — How does one have a conversation with someone who refuses to even “try” and understand some basic engineering of gasoline formulation (octane and oxygenates). The answer is, you can’t.

Comment on Importance of intellectual and political diversity in science by DaveW

$
0
0

Thanks Steven. Anecdotal, but interesting and not unexpected (except that someone would be non-conformist enough to pursue it).

Viewing all 148479 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images