Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all 148656 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Week in review by jim2

$
0
0

From the article:

What’s going on inside the Magic Temple

What’s going on behind the scenes in the world of Joule? Generally, the work falls in four areas.

1. Getting the organism to over-produce the alkane, alkene or alcohol of interest.

2. Getting a cost efficient photobioreactor design.

3. Controlling heat. Systems heat up in the day, when the sun is out. Cooling costs money.

4. Looking at ways to extend an organism’s productivity from “daylight hours” to “round the clock”.

Of all of the four, perhaps the fourth is the most fascinating and elusive of all., Because they would have to endow a photosynthetic organism with heterotrophic properties — train it to extract energy from sunlight by day, then extract if from sugar by night. That’s known as mixotrophic properties, and such organisms do exists. But they don’t, er, happen to naturally secrete diesel and jet fuel.

But there’s been work done, interestingly including Joule, and synecocchus elongatus. Last yearf we reported on efforts out of UC Davis to convert an obligate photoautotroph to a heterotroph is desirable for more efficient, economical and controllable production systems. More on that here.

http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2014/07/03/joules-quest-for-fuels-from-co2-sunlight-and-water/


Comment on Week in review by aaron

$
0
0

Greg wrote the Own Goal post. The credibility post was at dailykos by someone going by the name ClimateDenierRoundup.

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

$
0
0

So FOMD, the “Defender of the Faith,” now shrinks Mann’s original claim of 1,500 years down to a trrvial reproduction of the Lamb curve? Go back five or six centuries on it?

http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=338

Really? Is that your position? That the Hockey Stick never even addressed the MWP?

Even you can see that your case is collapsing, Eh FOMD?

Comment on Week in review by ordvic

$
0
0

Fan, you have a very short memory, convenient for you. Mann to JC: climate denier, anti-science, disinformation..

Comment on Week in review by John Carpenter

$
0
0

Joshua, I rather thought you shunned ‘but you did it first’ type arguments. Not to mention a ‘look squirrel’ styled argument wrt Salby. Remember, the topic of my comment was about Pukite’s lack of a response to Vitaly. Why change the topic?

Comment on Week in review by AK

$
0
0
If you read his post, and understood his <i>"tl:dr"</i> phrase, you can guess he didn't bother. I find it interesting how many other alarmist sites are pushing Laden's hit piece. IMO these attacks, and the junk going on at "theresphysics" tend to confirm my <a href="http://judithcurry.com/2014/09/08/vitaly-khvorostyanov-responds/#comment-625995" rel="nofollow">prediction</a>:<blockquote>The “tribe” these people belong to has a political agenda. Our hostess is a major pain in the neck in struggling (<i>"Jihad"</i>) for that agenda, in that she is already a recognized expert in the subject (climate), and strongly questions the political motivations conclusions without being overly critical of the real science.</blockquote><blockquote>So now, she’s co-author of a book having a good chance to become <b>the</b> major foundation for future cloud modelling. Think what that does to her position as an “authority”. And remember that for this tribe, there’s no such thing as real science (think Lysenko), there’s only what you can achieve in the argument. Remember the meaning of “dialectic” in dialectical materialism.</blockquote>BTW, I didn't bother trying to comment at Laden's site (I'm banned there anyway), but I'm sure he reads anything anybody says about it at a high-traffic place like here.

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

$
0
0

“The “decline” is one tree-ring record against many concurrent ones that don’t have a decline. ” Jim D.

So you explain to me Jim D, why, if it doesn’t work now, as soon as it got outside of Mann’s sandbox of data, we should have any reason to believe that it worked then?

I would bet a thousand dollars that you couldn’t even recapitulate my argument, even in an attempt to prove it wrong.

Comment on Week in review by Joshua

$
0
0
And don't forget this, Judith: <blockquote> curryja | August 28, 2014 at 12:52 pm | I am thinking I might <strong>need</strong> to respond to Gavin’s essay point by point, but I really don’t feel like doing this, i am leaving for travel and won’t have much time this weekend. Plus I have a lot of really interesting posts in the pipeline. So I probably will respond in more detail, but it might be up to a week before I get to it.</blockquote> Of course, changing your mind is certainly your prerogative...

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by kim

$
0
0

BigPrat shows us some stuff.
======

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

$
0
0

The Defender of the Faith FOMD is back to his 500 robustly = 1500 shtick again, or is it now that Mann only claimed 600 years? That claim is beneath even you. And that is saying something.

Mann and the hockey stick had nothing to say on the MWP? There is no evidence in the Hockey Stick that today is exceptional? The Hockey Stick makes no claims about whether the temp is any warmer today than 1000 years ago? If it was as warm or warmer a thousand years ago, WHAT ARE WE WORRIED ABOUT?

Wow, if that is Mann’s only claim, 600 years, I pronounce the controversy settled, on your terms FOMD,, on your terms. 600 year.

Comment on Week in review by Joshua

$
0
0

John –

==> “Why change the topic?”

I’m only expressing my concern for Brandon and tonyb.

Comment on Week in review by aaron

$
0
0

I recommend avoiding using the “own goal” phrase.

Here’s how I explained the meme up the thread:

It’s a phrase that indicates the author is impervious to the pangs of cognitive dissonance.

Don’t let the urge to argue drag you down to their childish tit-for-tat.

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

$
0
0

Yeah, because we all know that insurance companies woudn’t jack up rates unless absolutely needed!

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by TJA

$
0
0

Yeah, my check from big oil was a little late this week, so I could only put about 5K worth of gas in the Jet. It came today though, so I will be able to get back home!


Comment on Week in review by AK

$
0
0
<blockquote>[...] the horse is already well out of the barn and Judith certainly knows where her credibility stands with “established” climate science.</blockquote>Translation: the <i>"settled science"</i> crowd doesn't like her.<blockquote>It won’t really affect it by speaking for a policy group with specific financial interests on one side of the climate debate as it is simply continued confirmation of what many already knew.</blockquote>Translation: we hate everybody who's opposed to our socialist agenda.

Comment on Week in review by Edim

$
0
0

“Research has found that while around 1% of the general population are psychopaths, the level rises to 3% amongst business managers.”

No it doesn’t! It’s more like 97% amongst business menagers.

Comment on Week in review by AK

$
0
0

Exactly…

He read as much of it as Webdummy did of the new book.

Comment on Week in review by A fan of *MORE* discourse

Comment on Fraudulent(?) hockey stick by Padbrit (@Padbrit)

$
0
0

Abuse the usual response from people who have no actual scientific come back. Can you point me to some peer reviewed papers refuting the 97% consensus please?

Viewing all 148656 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images