Neil Fisher | April 26, 2012 at 4:15 am |
Sorry, no. You’ve mis-guessed the sources of my conclusions; I’ve taken approaches less susceptible to the Salbyist Fallacy, for the simple reason that C12/C13 ratio, while entertaining, is unduly complicated, akin to asking which pennies in a gumball machine were part of which loan interest payments and which were part of which loan capital payment. Clever if you can pull off the math, but pointless to do while there’s so many better options.
I think the anthropogenic causes of CO2 rise can be adequately proven without resort to the consilient C12/C13 ratios, thus cutting the Gordion Knot.
However, I needed to use Propositional Logic in addition to Judgement Logic to get there.