From folks who are much more forthright in their representation of the scientific evidence than you are:
Haha, that is a good one.
IPCC FAR:
under the IPCC Business-as-Usual (Scenario A) emissions of greenhouse gases, a rate of increase of global mean temperature during the next century of about 0.3°C per decade (with an uncertainty range of 0.2°C to 0.5°C per decade), this is greater than that seen over the past 10,000 years. This will result in a likely increase in global mean temperature of about 1°C above the present value by 2025 and 3°C before the end of the next century.”
1°C in 35 years is 0.285°C/per decade. And you defend that it is close to the warming observed. You just showed that your arguments are simple dialectic argumentation without regard for facts. That graph is a gross manipulation as it does not show what FAR predicted. Carbonbrief cannot be trusted. IPCC FAR prediction had a higher rate of warming than CMIP5 as everybody knows, including you.
Here is how FAR prediction looks now:
1°C from 1990 value (linear regression) to 2025. It is already off by more than 0.4°C, so it predicted more than double the warming observed. IPCC hypothesis has failed the test of being able to predict the future. It is therefore a failed hypothesis. Reducing its predicted warming at every report and moving its predictions to 2100 when every adult now will be dead will not change that it is a failed hypothesis.
