R. Gates
Just looked at that interesting paleo study on ocean temperatures which you cited.
Some excerpts that caught my eye:
Both water masses were ~0.9°C warmer during the Medieval Warm period than during the Little Ice Age and ~0.65° warmer than in recent decades.
and
Between 9 and 6 ka, the 500-m IWT trends resemble the NH surface high latitude reconstruction (24), suggesting that the HTM was 2.5 ± 0.4°C warmer than in the late 20th century. This is consistent with the surface estimate of 2.1 ± 0.2°C for the 30°N to 90°N latitudinal belt and is more than double the global ~0.7°C trend (24). The records from the deeper (600- to 900-m) sites, which arguably receive greater contributions from the SH, indicate that the IWT was 1.5 ± 0.4°C warmer during the HTM than the late 20th century.
and
The inferred similarity in temperature anomalies at both hemispheres is consistent with recent evidence from Antarctica (30), thereby supporting the idea that the HTM, MWP, and LIA were global events.
and
The comparison suggests that Pacific OHC was substantially higher during most of the Holocene than in the past decade (2000 to 2010), with the exception of the LIA. The difference is statistically significant, even if the OHC changes apply only to the western Pacific (~25% Pacific volume), although there are indications that similar trends extended farther east (15). The modern rate of Pacific OHC change is, however, the highest in the past 10,000 years (Fig. 4 and table S3).
So the paleo reconstruction suggests that:
- The ocean was warmer than today over most of the Holocene, except for the LIA
- The HTM was global and 1.5°C ± 0.4°C to 2.5°C± 0.4°C warmer than today
- The MWP was global and ~0.65°C warmer than today
- The LIA was global and ~0.25°C colder than today
- The modern rate of change is highest in past 10,000 years (as you wrote)
Hey, I can go along with these conclusions, Gates, keeping in mind that studies using paleo climate proxies are dicey to start off with and have an even harder time with rates of change than they do with absolute temperatures.
Can you go along with these conclusions, as well?
Thanks for a reply.
Max