agree, i like the short hair, more upkeep tho. Thx
Comment on JC at the National Press Club by curryja
↧
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by Mark Silbert
Richard Lindzen let’s it all hang out at Cato today. I’m not sure what motivated this but he’s fired both barrels.
http://www.cato.org/blog/reflections-rapid-response-unjustified-climate-alarm
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by Wagathon
I hope they can put to rest once and for all whether global warming is caused by aliens. (See–e.g.,http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB122603134258207975 )
↧
Comment on Week in review by Lance wallace
“Debate with Pat Michaels”. So you disagree on something?
↧
Comment on Greening the world’s deserts by Matthew R Marler
Rob Ellison: I think the jury is out on changing the terrestrial hydrological cycle – and the flow on effects from that.
That does not support your claim about an argument from ignorance.
And you ignore the evidence that increased CO2 promotes plant growth.
↧
↧
Comment on Week in review by omanuel
Events this week have raised many questions:
The 2009 Climategate emails and the current effort to prevent public debate through legal action have increased interest in two questionable models that appeared in 1946 as consensus science [1]:
1. Stars are filled with Hydrogen
2. Neutrons attract other neutrons
[In fact stars make and discard Hydrogen and atomic bombs explode because neutrons repel neutrons]
Were these models designed to prevent public knowledge of the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima [2]?
An almost complete “black-out” of news on the CHAOS & FEAR of nuclear annihilation that followed Stalin’s capture of Japan’s atomic bomb plant at Konan, Korea in late August 1945 [3] made it difficult for the public to decide if perhaps Stalin:
1. Emerged victorious from WWII, and
2. Established the UN on 24 Oct 1945 to expand totalitarian control globally [4]?
The scientific method will provide the answer because ultimately, “Truth is victorious, never untruth!”
References:
1. “Why Did You Deceive Us?” Message to the Congressional Space Science & Technology Committee (Dec 2013):https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/WHY.pdf
2. “Solar Energy,” Advances in Astronomy (Submitted 1 Sept 2014)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf
3. Aston’s WARNING (12 Dec 1922); CHAOS and FEAR (August 1945)https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
4. Did Stalin Plan To Rule The World?
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by Bob
Judith, this would be a worthy post.
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by jim2
I like this part of L’s piece:
…
Of course, science is not the only victim of this situation. Affordable energy has been the primary vehicle for the greatest advance in human welfare in human history. This issue promises to deny this to the over 1 billion humans who still lack electricity. For billions more energy will be much less affordable leading to increased poverty. Poverty, itself, is a major factor in reduced life expectancy. It requires a peculiarly ugly obtuseness to ignore the fundamental immorality of this issue.
…
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by Bob
Judith, this would be a worthy post. I mean Silbert’s link re: Lindzen
↧
↧
Comment on Week in review by captdallas2 0.8 +/- 0.2
Curious case? ” The results here reveal a larger picture–that the western tropical Indian Ocean has been warming for more than a century, at a rate faster than any other region of the tropical oceans, and turns out to be the largest contributor to the overall trend in the global mean sea surface temperature (SST)”
Who wudda thunk it.
↧
Comment on Week in review by jim2
Wow, you are one busy woman.
↧
Comment on Week in review by jim2
From the article:
…
U.S. crude oil fell on Friday, on track for its fourth daily decline on continued concerns about ample supply at a time of weak global economic data and fragile demand.
…
Brent crude hovered near $98 a barrel, up about 70 cents a barrel. U.S. crude ended down 66 cents at $92.41 a barrel. Both contracts saw their biggest drop in more than two weeks on Thursday.
…
↧
Comment on Week in review by sunshinehours1
Antarctic Sea Ice breaks 20 million sq km.
Antarctic and Arctic mirror image
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2014/09/18/arcticantarctic-mirror-graph-day-260/
↧
↧
Comment on Week in review by Paul Matthews
Polar bears doing situps is nothing. We learnt this week that polar bears have set up and operated their own website, polarbearsience.com, to tell the world they are doing fine, according to standup comic Michael Loftus.
↧
Comment on Week in review by jim2
From the article:
…
Analysts say prices could fall to a range of $3.15 to $3.25, and that more than 30 states can expect prices under $3 a gallon.
…
Typically when gas prices fall, it has a positive impact on consumer spending. Gasbuddy says that due to the decline in prices consumers will spend $2.5 billion less on gas this fall than they did last year and that the money saved could trickle into other areas of the economy.
…
↧
Comment on Week in review by jim2
Damn that CO2!!
↧
Comment on Week in review by Donald Rapp
If you watch the original Al Gore video, you will note that the phrases “we were amazed” and “they were amazed” occurred more than a dozen times. The implication was that climate scientists were amazed that things were much worse than they had expected. Lately, the climate scientists seem amazed that things are much better than they predicted. Altogether, it leads one to conclude that climate scientists are continually amazed because their models aren’t any good.
↧
↧
Comment on Week in review by jim2
Amazing!
↧
Comment on Week in review by JustinWonder
From “Obama Delays Climate Change Plan”
“In a conference call with reporters, the Environmental Protection Agency said it was extending the public comment period on the power plant rules for an additional 45 days, until 1 December.”
Of course, there is an election in November. I guess the POTUS doen’t think he can sell that plan tp the people. He is hoping for some MSM amnesia before the next election. I wonder how that tar sands oil pipeline thingy is going …
JustinWonder about the whole thing…
↧
Comment on Distinguishing the academic from the interface consensus by Wagathon
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
