Josh,
Let’s see now, lefties are on a roll on the Hayhoe case. And you, Josh, as Climate etc.’s alpha greenshirt leg-humper, are in the forefront of that “big-move” in your (hump! hump!) leg-humping best form. .
Let’s unpack your little lefty (hump! hump!) tactics here, Josh: Someone (moi) introduces a cautionary thought. That is, someone (again, moi) introduces a hypothesis consistent with all the known facts of the Hayhoe case (at least those known to you Josh and moi). And that alternative hypothesis is a plausible one that takes into account the lefty propensity for engaging in deception, as little boys and girls of the left have shown in matters of love, war, and politics since the stone-age. For that, someone (once again, moi) gets the standard lefty, close-minded, uncritically thought-out bum’s-rush (hump! hump!): CONSPIRACY THEORY!
Think about it, Josh, are there no lefty “false-flags”, no lefty used-car salesmen who mis-represent their wares, no lefty politicians who pretend one thing while doing another, no lefty, wannabe lover-boys on the make with a (wannabe hump! hump!) “line”? In your world Josh, apparently not. Everything lefty is to be taken at face value. Every lefty “false-flag” is to be uncritically received as presented. But not in my world. When an event becomes an adopted pet-booger of the left and is then lavished with solicitous lefty hype in service of the “cause”, in the manner of the Hayhoe case, then I get suspicious. Sergei Kirov-suspicious. And the lavish state-funeral doesn’t impress me or cause me to abandon my caution, either.
Again, Josh, the “facts” in the Hayhoe case that support your “cut” (which you’ve accepted with the uncritical, zealous enthusiasm of a true-believer) equally support my speculative, alternative, “conspiracy-theory” hypothesis. The only difference between the two of us? I keep a critical-thinking, open mind in the matter and am not “hard-over” on either or any hypothesis until I get a better investigation of the matter. But then–whatever the truth of the Hayhoe matter–my speculative hypothesis just happens to distract from one of your hive’s group-think, solidarity-test, hyped propaganda campaigns–and a good, lefty like you, Josh, dare not be seen having any critical, open-minded thoughts at such a time. Right, Josh? .
So, again, I say. Watch for more of this “DENIERS SEND DEATH THREATS/HATE MAIL TO CLIMATE SCIENTISTS” agit-prop. All well-timed and well-targed to promote the cause and demonize it’s “enemy-list.” And look for Josh to lead the pack-attack on this blog, uncritically pumping his pom-poms and at his hyped-up, (hump! hump!) leg-humping best.