Comment on Argument and authority in the climate fight by Lars P.

if they have no scientific theory they are doing astrology.
if they have a scientific theory I would like to see how its predictions are validated. If predictions are not validated or poorly validated then I would assume the 75 have done something wrong in their theory.
if prediction are only partially validated or there is not enough data then they miss something in the theory which needs to be improved or we need to wait and collect data.
what about if the 2 others have previously already said the theory would fail?
science is not advancing based on consensus.