“I’m not sure why anyone would object to taking the propaganda out of educational materials and to present data in a more meaningful way.”
I recall some of Wojick’s comments from last year when I seriously started monitoring this blog, which were about scientific argument. So I googled it and these are all from one thread I remembered reading:
http://judithcurry.com/2011/08/07/carbon-cycle-questions-part-ii/
“Human behavior, including scientific discourse, exists in the world. It is therefore open to scientific analysis. That is what I do.”
and
“My claim to fame is having discovered the hidden structure of expressed thought (writing and speaking) or, in simple terms, how sentences fit together. This is science, Logic to be precise, not philosophy. “
and
“I think I understand the climate debate better than anyone, not because I know more about climate but because I know more about the logic of complex issues. “
and
“The coal burners are my heroes and I am proud of my advocacy work, especially as I am winning and you are losing.”
Presented in his own words. You skeptics figure out what all this means. He’s your guy, deal with it.