Sometimes it is difficult to summon a desire to respond to someone who can’t follow a thread. I’m having to guess on how to italicise here – apologies if it doesn’t work:
[I]“And don’t be ridiculous – “If one assumes” is not an invitation to assume.”[/I]
Yes it is.
[I]“And since you accept the effect of aerosols, clouds etc is “arbitrary” –
indeterminate as of now? – how can we also know they are “sizeable” ?”[/I]
You misread for about the fifth time. I did not *accept* that the effect of aerosols is “arbitrary”.
[I]“And as regards the ‘waffle’, what claim [of Lindzen's] do you refer to ?
Steve M : [non-responsive]“[/I]
This is very confusing, because it is you who is accusing me of “waffle”. I have not accused Lindzen of waffle.