It looks like more of the middling conversational tactics in the face of rejection of the consensus. Lots of seemingly harmless moderate statements and platitudes are included. Walking back and whitewashing what has actually happened on the climate front. Anyside could read into the text if they wish.
“Equally those of an opposite viewpoint may exaggerate the extent of future global warming because of their affinities towards greater regulation and world government.”
In REALITY, there has been nothing “EQUALLY” about the 20 year effort to ram AGW down the publics throat in the name of science. If Nurse had his way the objective observer would just forget what a thug and bully, politically correct culture the Royal Academy has become regarding AGW settled science pimps.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100140510/sir-paul-nurse-saviour-of-the-universe/
