Bart R -
Finally, the touch-point for this tiff was the modeling of
an agent who believes that climate models are as close to falsification [...] as mathematically possible”
Jeez. Couldn’t they have used an actual example of denier logic instead of twisting words to slander someone who is CLEARLY NOT A DENIER? For me, the actual comment was a teasing observation that IPCC claims will be falsifiable in principal just as soon as the 54 key mathematical uncertainties have been fully worked out. That’s FUNNY.
Of course, to be falsifiable in principle is a key differetiator between science and religion.