Dr. Curry,
Most skeptics I am aware of do not agree with the Greenhouse Dragon.
Using the Dragon as a proxy for ‘what skeptics believe’ is a bit of a straw man.
Spencer, Lindzen, Pielke, Sr. and Salby all have critiques of AGW catastrophism that has nothing to do with the Dragon.
While it is as much fun to attack a fringe like the Dragon, as it is to jump on Gore or Romm or Hansen for their ‘fever’ talk, or spittle flecked spews or tipping points, I do not believe that many in the AGW community actually support such extremist non-science from that side either.
Perhaps it would be more constructive to not kick a dead dragon?
↧
Comment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by hunter
↧