I am afraid that as a sceptic with limited time to keep following the issue, my need for efficient choices and to use my time best puts two black marks against this article straight away:
Firstly the title: :Climate change and moral judgement”. As someone trained in physics the term, “climate change” (a vague, much misused and now propagandist term, formerly a 4.5 billion year natural phenomenon) instead of “anthrpogenic global warming” indicates bias or lack of clarity or political correctness in place of fact or ignorance.
Secondly my training teaches me that science is fact based and moral judgment (other than in the case of biological or weapons based research topics etc) only comes once there is some reasonably established science. In fact making moral judgments first is the antithesis of true science. So I have not reached the stage where any moral judgement is anything more than a scientifcally dangerous source of subjectiviism and bias.
So thanks for the invitation but I will not be reading the article.