The first three or four questions are vital as they set the tone and shoud be as objective as possible. Whether we will ever agree on the first few questions depends on how objective everyone is prepared to be in setting aside their existing prejudices and politics.
OK. So, if you do not like David’s node 1 questions or statement, why do you object to mine?
“Mitigate AGW or Adapt to climate change whatever it may be?
Surely that question is:
- Objective
- Unbiased
- Free of prejudices and politics
- Focuses on the key issue that needs to be decided (and agreed)
- Is likely to be recognised by the vast majority of the population as the key issue
- Is not buried in the bowels of science, and in just one branch of science