Reason they switched from every year to ”decadel” is my fault. I kept pointing to the leading Warmist, politicians and editors, academics, bureaucrats, that: Swindlers pretending to know to one thousandth of a degree; if the GLOBAL temp is gone / down from one year to another – when nobody is monitoring on 99,999% of the planet, is admission of credibility, nothing to do with the global temp.
So, they started to talk about ”decadel” as part of their ”science on the run” Which means: ”in 10y, needs less sensitivity than for every year”. Even though: multiplying zero by 10, or by 100, is still zero. But that is irrelevant for them. B] (note that on their charts is still vibrating ”for every year” as if the planet has hi-fever, it’s not DECADEL…?
Jim D pointed to me; how they get it correctly to one thousandth of a degree: as his example: if I give him the temp for the beginning of the hour, and the end – they can get in a thousandth of a degree for every second…? I.e. if is 22C in the beginning of the hour, 24C on the end, approximate temp, easy!
Or is it easy? If the first 5 minutes was 22C, -then gone to 21 for 40 minute – then to 22C for next 6minute – and finishes the hour on 24C. It wouldn’t match the above data, would it? What about on the 99,99% on the planet where the temp is not monitored? Don’t ask!!! DECADEL IS ONLY THEIR KICKING AND SCREAMING ON THE WAY TO THE CONFESSION BOX. Silencing stefan, doesn’t silence the truth – the cat is already out of the bag / documented!!!