Comment on Does the Aliasing Beast Feed the Uncertainty Monster? by Norm Kalmanovitch

The expectations are based on what fourier analysis demonstrates does not exist which is why AGW supporters expected warming from 2002 to today because of increased CO2 emissions but have only been presented with cooling for the past nine years and counting.
If the expectation is that CO2 emissions will cause catastrophic global warming when is this warming expected to resume ?
In 2006 the Hathaway NASA expectation for solar cycle 24 was that it would be greater than cycle 23 allowing for the dismissal of solar influence as being the prime driver of climate change.
The Hathaway NASA 2011 prediction now shows that 24 is less than half them 23 cycle amplitude.
It seems that expectations are wrong when they are improperly based on fabricated computer models and non existant correlations so what exactly do you mean by “this kind of tatally wrong arguments”