At 10:07 on 24 May, <b>A fan of [suppressing] discourse</b> continues his pseudopsychological ranting about this, your humble respondent, to appeal for the censorship of what he is terrified to address, whining: <blockquote>Judith, please let suggest that you (and Climate Etc. readers) review the scientific literature realting to violent fantasy and dangerousness.
Summary: Homicidal fantasies, repeatedly and publicly expressed, are reasonable grounds for serious concern. </blockquote>
The fact that no "Liberal" fascist wants to confront in open discourse is that everything he and his co-conspirators wish to do to inoffensive, innocent people desirous only of living their lives in peace and freedom is fundamentally and inescapably <b>violently aggressive</b>.
Every "There Oughtta Be a Law!" impulse on the part of these vicious meddlers relies upon government employees - in one way or another - pointing guns at people and killing as many of them as necessary <i>pour encourager les autres</i>.
Remember that quote from one of the "Liberals'" great heroes - Mao Zedong: <blockquote><b>"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."</b></blockquote>
<b>A fan of [suppressing] discourse</b> not only wants political power, for himself and his faction but he wants the muzzle of that gun pointed at <b><i>you</i></b> personally, reader, at your peaceable neighbors, at your children and other relatives, at the folks who grow your food and serve your other needs, at inoffensive complete strangers, and at generations yet to come.
Who's the guy sweating and straining to make his <i>"violent fantasy"</i> a reality?
The fellow speaking to the individual human being's right to self-defense in the face of arbitrary and unlawful authority, or the clown that's pushing a scheme of aggressive violence made pervasive and utterly tyrannical?
↧