Comment on Doubt has been eliminated (?) by Lauri Heimonen

Gro Harlem Brundtland, the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy on Climate Change, said:
”So what is it that is new today? What is new is that doubt has been eliminated. The report of the International Panel on Climate Change is clear. And so is the Stern report. It is irresponsible, reckless and deeply immoral to question the seriousness of the situation. The time for diagnosis is over. Now it is time to act (Brundtland 2007).”
That kind of doubt can not be eliminated, as there is no due premise for that.
It is well known that in reality IPCC can’t present any evidence according to which the recent global warming could be controlled by the increase of atmospheric CO2 content. Even there is no valid evidence according to which the atmospheric CO2 content could be controlled by the increase of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. There are only hypotetical climate model calculations, being essentially based on assumed parameters. The assumed increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere during the industrial time periode is one of this kind of main assumptions.
As I have closely argued in the thread http://judithcurry.com/2011/08/04/carbon-cycle-questions (May 9, 2012 at 10:56 am) the recent multidecadal increasing trend of carbon dioxide in the atmoshere is a consequence of warming and not vice versa i.e. the warming trend of sea surface waters at upper latitudes is controlling the increasing trend of CO2 in atmosphere; even nowadays the anthropogenic influence is too minimal to be found by measurements.