The link is truncated. I assume that is in Energy Fuels journal?
It is probably behind a paywall anyways so what is the key point in your article?
I have a pragmatic view bases on material science.
Co2 is like any other dopant. The dopants that go into the silicon that makes your computers compute are added at elevated temperature. It’s not like the dopants like to stay in the silicon at that temperature, just that they have sufficient thermal energy to diffuse into the silicon substrate. Then when the silicon is quenched the dopants will stay put.
That’s what we are seeing with co2. Lots of the excess partial pressure is taken up by the ocean, yet the diffusional random walk of the molecules guarantees that a large fraction are staying in the atmosphere.
Edim the contrarian would argue about this on a computer that he would assert could not work.