“A fan of more discourse”
Your ad hom slur of Czech President, Václav Klaus, misses the point.
Apparently you can only attack the messenger, but have nothing worthwhile to comment on his message in the Financial Post:
To sum up my simple message: Empirical data are important; scientific discoveries are important; the disclosure of malpractices in the IPCC and other “bastions” of the global-warming debate are important; but we have to take part in the undergoing ideological battle. The subtitle of my five-year-old book is What is Endangered: Climate or Freedom? There is no doubt that it is all about freedom.
Written by a guy that knows first-hand what “endangered freedom” is all about.
If you have issues with his message, state them. The snickering ad hom approach is a waste of words.
Max