Very perceptive studies Martha. Do you have one that shows why the attempt by the President of the US to pass laws promoting your position failed, even with super majorities in both houses? And another one showing why the US Government failed to support Kyoto and subsequent events attempting to get world agreement to laws restricting CO2?
Of course recent events in the US to remove funding from the Government scientists who promote your favorite “science” and related laws are not in any way related to lack of trust in these “scientists”. These will likely be accompanied by hearings that will give even broader exposure to the phony science being promoted by your friends and associates.
All the studies you quote are somewhat like the IPCC reports and the Hockey Stick itself. They appear to be desperate attempts to promote policies that are going nowhere. My own prediction is that the European Governments who bought into the phony science will reverse their punitive taxes as they also begin to realize that they were duped by phony science dressed up by PR firms and scientists who long ago abandoned any pretense of doing ethical work.
It wasn’t just the CRU emails and it wasn’t just the Hockey Stick. It was the whole load of manure that just cannot be dressed up and promoted as something other than the garbage that it is.
Judy and many others appear to believe that carefully done science may justify policies about CO2 someday. My expectation is that it will be many years before such science could overcome the well justified lack of trust in those promoting CAGW now. And the time when that work could begin to achieve credibility likely won’t start until there is a general house cleaning at the institutions that promoted the phony science.