■ Acknowledge that many geoengineering methods have significant uncertainties …, and support rigorous and fully transparent research efforts to reduce these uncertainties.
-> can we try this one first with the IPCC?
Also, why the discussion about the vulnerabilities of geo-engineering to terrorism and war? Are we really assuming that emissions standards wil be followed during war?
Finally, haven’t we been doing geo-engineering already? As we know, all the models have projected way too hot because those damn aerosols. If we could exert such influence that without even trying to, think what we could do with the specific end in mind. (If you reject the idea that anthro-aerosols can work, then you now have no way to reconcile the models, which leaves with an even weaker case that there is a problem in the first place)