Comment on Week in review 3/23/12 by DocMartyn
“Depending on the inertia of the system it can take several centuries” Naughty boy Mosher. Why not just work out what the inertia of the system is? Does the system respond to a loss of sunlight by...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security by...
Bart, do you have an alter ego? Sometimes you actually make sense
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Theo Goodwin
Yes, the same angry teenager who so often skins his shins.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Herman Alexander Pope
This remarkable increase is very similar to the remarkable increase that has happened time and time again over the past ten thousand years. Warm, then Cool, Then Warm Then Cool, then Warm, then Cool,...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by anon
What I find interesting about CFLs and mercury is how many advocates of CFLs are also advocates of AGW, but when you point out to them that the government says that CFls are dangerous and need to be...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by WebHubTelescope
I adopted a few of the original blogs early on. I make it a habit to check This Week in Science every Saturday, written by DS...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Chief Hydrologist
‘Large, abrupt climate changes have affected hemispheric to global regions repeatedly, as shown by numerous paleoclimate records (Broecker, 1995, 1997). Changes of up to 16°C and a factor of 2 in...
View ArticleComment on NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security by Bart R
Since you’ve got me researching, I might as well share my pain. http://www.zerofuel.org/uploads/ZeroFueldownload_1_.pdf
View ArticleComment on NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security by Beth...
Tonyb @ 24/3 4.55pm re your sea rise record, eg the marker at Port Arthur, Tasmania showing 2.5cm rise since 1841 . Across Bass Strait on Victoria’s Mornington Peninsular, along a road cutting on Port...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Gwyneth Cravens
Putting risks of energy sources in perspective . . . . DEATHS PER TERAWATT HOUR Coal – world average 161 (26% of world energy, 50% of electricity) Coal – China 278 Coal – USA 15 Oil 36 (36% of world...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Oliver K. Manuel
Tonight it is time to draw the curtain on a social experiment that escaped detection for sixty four years [2009-1945 = 64 years] until first exposed by Climategate emails and documents in November 2009...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Herman Alexander Pope
I have some LED lights that had reasonable prices.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Peter Davies
@Chief “It would be remarkable if it didn’t change remarkably” Sudden climate change is the only thing about climateology that concerns me, notwithstanding that “sudden” would be probably be spread...
View ArticleComment on NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security by Bart R
Those capacitor guys sure know how to throw a party. The “virtual water” content of oil, too, is increasing, and is a concern to everyone involved in Policy I know. That Canada was able to lobby the EU...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Peter317
But we're not actually talking about changing the number or size of the holes, are we? We're actually talking about changing the <i>statistical probability</i> that the holes are going to...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by R. Gates
Tony B., If you believe (as I do) that clmate is not just a random walk, but there are real and multiple forcings, which added together along with their various positive and negative feedbacks, add up...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Edim
WHT, that looks good on the face of it. It confirms my opinion that the seasonal CO2 variation is caused by temperature, not by vegetation in NH (consensus).
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Jim Cripwell
R. Gates you write “The reverse of this, that is, dissecting out the individual components is exactly what Foster & Rahmstorf and others have done to see the overall underlying signal of...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Jim Cripwell
R. Gates I forgot to ask. Did F&R calculate the climate sensitivity of the GHGs? And if so, what value did they get?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by R. Gates
Peter, I don’t think it is disingenuous at all to talk about increasing greenhouse gases changing the overall probabilistic environment of any single weather event. And the increase in atmospheric and...
View Article