Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Browsing all 155806 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by John Kosowski

“Pseudoscience wins. There is absolutely no scientific justification for calling it a threat to public health. The claim they used that carbon dioxide causes global warming is false.” Sure there is....

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by Eli Rabett

FWIW the question is backwards. It’s not that being Republican in the US makes people stupid, it’s that stupid people are attracted to the Republican party (OK, this is a troll, but think about the...

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by P.E.

You hit the key word: reactionary. The environmental movement in general, and the climate movement in particular are reactionary.

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by RiHo08

Here I go again. Now I am confused. I can’t remember if I am a Republican, Democrat, Independent, Trotsky-ite… I guess I’ll need a functional MRI to figure that one out. Its bad enough that I have...

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by harrywr2

Considering I am ‘conservative’ I don’t find my premise inaccurate. There is nothing at all wrong with taking a ‘wait and see’ approach to ‘new theories’. Most of them end being up wrong. As far as...

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by P.E.

Precisely. Environmentalism at it’s core is reactionary. What makes it appeal to the left is the potential for acquisition of power. Ideologically, it’s quite the opposite of the progressive faith in...

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by MattStat/MatthewRMarler

So who is an authoritarian, someone who accedes to EPA regulations or one who does not? Who is authoritarian, one who accepts the claims of “climate consensus” or one who points to the limitations in...

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by MattStat/MatthewRMarler

Eli Rabbitt: <i> It’s not that being Republican in the US makes people stupid, it’s that stupid people are attracted to the Republican party </i> There are plenty of stupid people in both...

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by Ryan Maue

I am really confused. Say you are a conservative and/or evangelical like Dr. Kerry Emanuel or Dr. Katarine Hayhoe that believes wholeheartedly in the AGW policy proscriptions. How do we explain their...

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by P.E.

Yes, that’s a troll. Now go back in your bunny hole. Herbivores are dumber than carnivores, btw. Scientific fact.

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by JJ

The crap Mooney is spouting is nothing more or less than the Horoscope Effect (e.g. ambiguous and flattering commentary about Libras is judged by Libras to be unexpectedly insightful) expanded into an...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment on Republican(?) brain by cui bono

“They are consistent with findings that liberalism, as a political orientation, is associated with higher IQ, relative to conservatism” (p890). Duh, doc, dose pretty picture things on page 887, dum,...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment on Republican(?) brain by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2

Actually, people that know they don’t know everything are attracted to the Republican party. People that think they know everything are attracted to the Democratic party. Strong language and it is...

View Article


Comment on Republican(?) brain by Grzejnik

Boy that Moonie is a barking idiot….

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by jim

The AUG, putting Mooney on the board, has spoken for themselves.

View Article


Comment on Week in review 3/31/12 by R. Gates

Of course it stands to reason that skeptics would shy away the kind of logical analysis and perspective on extreme climate events such as presented by Dr.Trenberth. But as the extremes continue occur...

View Article

Comment on Republican(?) brain by David Springer

WebHubTelescope | March 30, 2012 at 9:53 am | Reply “Are the academics smart? Of course they are. Are the smart enough to plan our lives? No.” —————————– They plan your life more than you know. If you...

View Article


Comment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by ppirila

Peter The extra energy is coming from the back radiation. Based on S-B you can calculate the change in gross radiation, not that in the net.

View Article

Comment on Week in review 3/31/12 by Latimer Alder

Can somebody remind me why I should give a t**s about how much sea ice there is ..whether increasing or decreasing? I really don’t care much about the fate of the polar bears which are not the cute and...

View Article

Comment on Week in review 3/31/12 by Political Junkie

Here’s a fascinating chronology of “unusual weather events” (a.k.a. weather weirding) dating back to 2 A.D! http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf

View Article
Browsing all 155806 articles
Browse latest View live