Comment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Richard Betts
Hi Judith You’ve missed out another important part of the MSNBC interview with Lovelock: He [Lovelock] said human-caused carbon dioxide emissions were driving an increase in the global temperature, but...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by cui bono
Presumably, we of a sceptical bent are supposed to welcome Lovelock’s partial recantation, and hope that goodwill towards him will encourage others to step into the light. Magnanimity, after all....
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by kakatoa
To your- “Climate change bingo, or roulette, or monopoly, the possibilities are endless” comment there is some big news in regards to monopoly as the biggest PV facility in the world was just turned on...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by lolwot
Hi Dr Curry, I notice this post isn’t at the top of the blog, I think it’s got the wrong post date.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by lolwot
I never took lovelock seriously, I just didn’t get the whole gaia thing. Seemed a bit sci-fi.
View ArticleComment on Perils of apocalyptic thinking by WebHubTelescope
jim2, I don’t see how I can put words in your mouth when you type those very words in yourself! All I have to do is copy & paste a quote of yours. “Jim2 | April 27, 2012 at 8:59 am | Reply Joe –...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by climatereason
Judith Probably more appropriate to repost this latest Royal Society scaremongering here...
View ArticleComment on Perils of apocalyptic thinking by lolwot
A sudden rise in temperatures could be catastrophic. I think each, eg 0.2C rise, in temperature carries some risk, mainly because so much on earth is somewhat sensitive to temperature and no-one...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by NW
“I am especially a ‘cheesburger-hating’ liberal.” Oh you should see some of the s–t they have in China. I was especially taken by “duck lips” (their translation to Engrish): Chewy, almost jerky-fied...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Punksta
o/t warning ! The argument has been made (eg by Tamino) that although global surface air average temperature trend has been flat since 1997, this does not mean global warming has stopped. The reasoning...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Wagathon
Sounds better than Icelandic sheep’s head.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Chief Hydrologist
So the webfuscator has found a new word of the day. Dialectic however requires understanding, humility, good faith, good humour and implies empathy and 2 way communication. Qualities sadly lacking in...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Wagathon
But, only reliable in the long term, right?
View ArticleComment on Ignorance: the true engine of science by Bart R
kim | April 26, 2012 at 11:13 am | You are simply deluded, Bart. You can say ‘eight full inquiries’ and call criticism of that remark ‘snark’? Ah, kim. But you misunderstand, and it is my fault. I do...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Chief Hydrologist
And he refuses to join any club that will accept him as a member.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 4/27/12 by Chief Hydrologist
That can’t be right – in the longer term climate is non-linear.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Week in review 4/27/12 by peterdavies252
I had a look at the Delingpole interview and find much of it to be true. The fact that Palmer was on the panel with Minchin was a distinct plus as far as I was concerned. While I can’t speak for...
View ArticleComment on Perils of apocalyptic thinking by Bart R
WebHubTelescope | April 28, 2012 at 2:16 am | No worries. The medium is imperfect, and I’m notably incomprehensible at my best. Though, the smiley was NW’s.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Perils of apocalyptic thinking by NW
I could have some emoticons backwards. I thought meant ‘hey I’m being light-hearted but basically straightforward and friendly.” Then there is the “winky,” , which I thought meant “This remark is to be...
View Article