Comment on Week in review 5/4/12 by hunter
R. Gates, Your attempt at pretending skeptics do not follow the science implies that you are not sure if things have warmed since the LIA. Have they not warmed since the LIA? Have they cooled since the...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Michael
Bart has been pointing it out to you for sometime. As have many others over the past year or so. When you keep using technigques that have been patiently explained to you as being...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by Greybeard
Ah c’mon Hunter! Uncalled for. Mr/Ms Gates makes clear arguments pretty politely.
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by WebHubTelescope
It’s not really dishonesty. It is complete ineptitude. This is what Girma’s curve looks like when it is projected into the future: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/26/girmatrendology.gif/ Notice...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by kim
Heat content, as Pielke Pere is wont to say. ===============
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Martha
I don’t know about that, Don, but I do know that it is generally intellectually honest to accurately identify the author’s theoretical approach to social analysis, otherwise you may misunderstand...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by kim
I would say that doubling the length of time for modern Argos buoys, measuring the reservoir containing the vast bulk of the heat, would be very useful, particularly for sorting out natural effects....
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by climatereason
iolwot You linked helpfully to the critique of the 2009 paper. I got the impression that Graham was talking about a new report? tonyb
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Kip Hansen
Willis….you should have stopped after your first sentence –> ‘Judith, thank you for your reply.’ You can not possibly think that your abrasive hack and slash attack-style commenting approach will be...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Jim Cripwell
DocMartyn you write “It take it you haven’t been reading the whole defining uncertainty thing then.” Of course I have. This is not a question of uncertainly. It is a question of not knowing. The...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by WebHubTelescope
“Today he has no need to. The world has moved on. The blogosphere has matured and grown. He gains a much wider, much more immediate and much more diverse readership in near real time. “ That is...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by curryja
Let’s say I start attacking Michael Mann. What will that accomplish, other than to have him sue me? Mann has just won another big award. People disagree as to whether Mann is a hero or a criminal. For...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by David L. Hagen
Girma How do you distinguish your model from the null hypothesis of natural variations? How do you distinguish your model from <a href="http://www.fel.duke.edu/~scafetta/" / rel="nofollow">Nicola...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Greybeard
Could 5 people really corrupt a whole institution ?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by sunshinehours1
I meant Feb/March colder than 1878 NOW.
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Bart R
sunshinehours1 | May 8, 2012 at 1:55 pm | Bart, why are the IPCC predictions total crap? What a great question....
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by kim
One side listens to reason on the science of the radiative effect, but not on the science of feedbacks and model uncertainty and not on the policy about proper inquiries. The other side listens to...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/4/12 by Erica
R Gates, Still on the temperature gradient theme. Your stated assumption here is that heat transfer is generally ocean->atmosphere, not the the other way round, implying the oceans are generally...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Bart R
Mr. McIntyre To quote me, “These questions are bounded by the nature of what can be objectively settled by the process of hearing witnesses and reviewing evidence.” If the terms of an inquiry do not...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by Michael
No chance. Quibblers never let the chance for a quibble go by.
View Article