Comment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by R. Gates
So Mike Flynn, According to you, over a 24 hour period, the net effect of CO2 in the atmosphere is a wash…no net cooling or net warming. Take all the CO2 out of atmosphere and nothing would happen. Is...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by sunshinehours1
“To this physical scientist, the troposphere is basically a heat engine which dissipates thermal energy input at its warmer interface to the tune of 240W/m^2.” Every minute of every day is 240W/m^2?
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate: Part II by roncram
It seems to me the paper has completely neglected the impact of Climategate on climate scientists. For example, did the paper cover the fact Eduardo Zorita publicly stated that Phil Jones, Michael Mann...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate: Part II by roncram
It seems the paper also neglected the strong criticisms by McIntyre of the “investigations” into Climategate. To any objective observer, a paper such as this would have to discuss the investigations...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate: Part II by roncram
David, Love this line! – “Republicans become engineers, where reality really matters.”
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by sunshinehours1
Do we let bookmakers score the boxing match too? And adjust the score: Lets see in round 1934 Boxer A scored a 5 but we need Boxer A to lose so lets adjust round 1934 downwards multiple times depending...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by sunshinehours1
Outside? Feb and March of this year are not even warmer than 1878. https://sunshinehours.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/hadcrut3gl_mar.png...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by MattStat/MatthewRMarler
Steven Mosher: Sensitivity has nothing to do with C02. The “sensitivity” that matters in the policy debate is the sensitivity to change in atmospheric CO2 concentration. The TCS that was estimated by...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by MattStat/MatthewRMarler
David L. Hagen: <i> On evidence for solar vs CO2 as driving climate</i> If CO2 concentration continues to increase and solar activity continues to decline, the actual temperature/climate...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Girma
I have not projected my empirical model until 2200. You cannot do that. My model applies only for the 20th century. If you assume the climate pattern does not change in 150 years, we would still have...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by WebHubTelescope
“Web, why don’t you plot my model until 2100 so that we are not comparing apples and organs with the IPCC?” I guess that would be showing a bias. You were the one that developed the model after all,...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by WebHubTelescope
<blockquote>"I have not projected my empirical model until 2200. You cannot do that. My model applies only for the 20th century. " </blockquote> A great example of bias, that statement....
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Girma
If you assume the climate pattern does not change in 150 years, we would still have been in the little ice age.
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Girma
Web The problem with empirical models is you can not use them for projection far from their range. Web, it is only a description of the climate pattern of the 20th century. May be It could be valid for...
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by WebHubTelescope
Nice metaphor. “There isn’t just one bullet in the revolver, there are five with just one empty slot.” And the one empty slot is fossil fuel depletion. The consensus moral of the Russian roulette story...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Girma
I guess your “secular” model goes into a hiatus. Don’t you think it can reverse?
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by thisisnotgoodtogo
thread terns for the better chicken littles on the run
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by WebHubTelescope
“Web, it is only a description of the climate pattern of the 20th century. “ Oh I see. Your model is just a description of everything that happened in the past. That is the best skeptical climate model...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Girma
<i>You were the one that developed the model after all</i> I modelled it to describe the climate pattern of the 20th century, you applied it for the climate of the next 200 years, for an...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by WebHubTelescope
“It is invalid because extrapolation does usually work for empirical models.” You said it, extrapolation works for many an empirical model. I have an empirical model for predicting sunrise and sunset...
View Article