Comment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Brandon Shollenberger
You should be careful Steven Mosher. There are plenty of people who don’t talk about what Girma does because they think it’d be a waste of time. For example, what would be the point of me saying...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Steven Mosher
dont forget my nickname is moshpit. My primary concern here is the lack of skepticism on the part of skeptics. If you want to estimate ECR and TCR from observations there is a way to do it. You have to...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Girma
The proof of the pudding is in the eating: 100% of the last 100 years global mean temperature lie within the GMT band as shown => http://bit.ly/HRvReF Need I say more? Let the above graph defend...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Chief Hydrologist
You may shift the goalposts if you like buy I like to be precise in mathematical terminology. The fractral refers to the similarlity of the power law behaviour at all scales. ‘In this article, a...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by sunshinehours1
“as Miller points out, actual projections of the drought indices, based on both heat and rainfall and their time distribution show droughts to increase.” Projections are not actual drought. Failure of...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by sunshinehours1
Heartland were right. The AGW cult is full of insane people.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by kcom1
Did the 10:10 people ever say that? Serious question. Did they ever catch hell for their ugly campaign (well, really, beyond ugly) outside the bounds of climate skeptic blogs? Serious question. Is...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by sunshinehours1
” This is related to Hansen’s loaded dice article where he showed that 3-sigma very-hot seasonal anomalies are now much more likely than the half percent they used to be. ” And yet, the NOAA’s own data...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by Nicola Scafetta
I would like to thank Judith for the comment. Actually the latest paper complement a set of papers that I published of this topic since 2010. In particular it is coupled to Scafetta [2012c] that...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by pokerguy
Some might seem insane to us, yes. Just as we seem insane to them. The point is. we’ve handed them the 2×4 with which they’re now so hypocritically bashing us over the heads. Why give them anything?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by omanuel
Scafetta is headed in the right direction. Tidal effects influence the flow and the nature of energy flowing from the Sun. Leaders of the National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, and the United...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by climatereason
Jim I record the past which perhaps is different to ‘explaining the past.’ Bearing in mind we have seen a long slow thaw lasting 350 years (with several advances and retreats) the odds are on a...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Don Monfort
I see that Judith has deleted my comment in reply to you calling me “cheeky”, Brandon. I guess it is OK to call someone “cheeky”, but “baby”. is verbotten. You are engaged in useless semantic quibbling...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by R. Gates
Scott Denning, in his essay on the Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media said: “They’re not evil. They care deeply about their children’s and grand children’s’ futures, and genuinely want to do...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by sunshinehours1
Why bend over and allow them to say and do whatever they want?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by Peter317
This is related to Hansen’s loaded dice article where he showed that 3-sigma very-hot seasonal anomalies are now much more likely than the half percent they used to be Which just might begin to hold...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by sunshinehours1
The issue is not that skeptics “genuinely want to do what’s right”. The issue is that AGW cult members want to destroy the economics (and power grid) of the western world for microscopic changes in...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by Peter317
James Hansen: Some scientists may be able to spend their time blogging and e-mailing without a significant impact on their scientific productivity — I’m not one of them But he can afford to spend a lot...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 5/18/12 by Stew Green
“Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, easy to say but incorrect “Absence of evidence is not PROOF of absence” If police don’t find a body in a burned out house that is strong evidence that...
View Article