Comment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Tom
Very good Michael, this is rapid progress for you. Michael | May 19, 2012 at 8:49 pm | Reply “ignorance is bliss.” Now you only need to think for yourself, like Edison used to do.
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by David L. Hagen
Peter Lang On economic risk, <a...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Michael
I’ll remember to put the ‘end sarcasm’ in for you nex time.
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Bob Ludwick
“Global warming is real, it is caused by man-made CO2 emissions, and we need to do something about it.” “How can we best reduce suffering from global warming?” The two axioms of ‘Climate Science’...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by manacker
Bart R So I’m not surprised by many otherwise bright people having trouble with the simple concept of paying for what doesn’t belong to them. After all, a lot of you have been exposed to politicians...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Kent Draper
You sound silly Bart, you are afraid of something that has not happened and looks like the outcome will be just the opposite to your fears. Yet you want me to pay to not have it happen. How did you get...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by gbaikie
“I’d also make the point that nuclear fuel resources are effectively unlimited in the Earth’s crust. ” Minable nuclear fuel in earth crust is not unlimited, it’s vast, but not unlimited. “Current usage...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by kakatoa
Retail Rate and Cost Issues with Renewable Development May 22, 2012– 10:00 a.m. At The CEC in Sacramento. Agenda-...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Peter Lang
Error in my post @ May 21, 2012 at 7:39 pm: 25% should read 250% in this sentence: “there would be a 250% cost penalty if only half the emissions are included”
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
Peter, I can look at mindmap. But we are talking about a significant issue analysis and mapping effort. Do you have a possible source of initial funding?
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Stephen Rasey
These questions are hopeless as a useful, objective preamble to a conference. How can you possibly make sense of different qualitative answers from each participant in the time allowed? If they...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Stephen Rasey
<i>Since when have atomic bombs saved one life?</i> Since 1945. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall" rel="nofollow">(Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet)...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Stephen Rasey
Since when has fire insurance save one life Fire Insurance is responsible for the creation of building codes. Insurance companies won’t insure unsafe buildings. (…or were you just asking a rhetorical...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by gbaikie
http://s11.zetaboards.com/Sky_dragon/index/ It’s Chris Ho-Stuart’s board. It seems to me, he likes that kind of thing.
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by Wagathon
You can’t simply ignore the fact that Bjorn Lomborg himself is saying in the preceding post that, “The partnership among self-interested businesses, grandstanding politicians and alarmist campaigners...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by David L. Hagen
Michael I understand the Copenhagen Consensus to be trying to allocate scarce humanitarian resources on a benefit/cost basis. The R&D items examined on climate change appear to have far lower...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Harold Pierce Jr
BREAKER! BREAKER! How many times do I have to post this comment here and elsewhere before you guys finally wake up and pay attention to this seminal monograph. RE: Climate Change, What the Russians...
View ArticleComment on Copenhagen Consensus 2012 by willard
I wish to express my gratitude to Rob Starkey, who made me think about the same question a while ago.
View Article