Comment on Public engagement on climate change by KPO
“The countries increasing their CO2 emissions the most are: South Africa (home of Durban), Egypt, Brazil, Vietnam, Iran, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, India and China.” But then, “EU bailout...
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Chris Ho-Stuart says.. …..”A number of my co-authors did have degrees in physics, and specific expertise in thermodynamics. No great expertise was actually needed. A competent undergraduate...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by Willis Eschenbach
Thanks, M. carey. It means that Spanier falsely claimed that a proper investigation had occurred, when nothing could be further from the truth. It says nothing about Mann's guilt or innocence at all....
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by manacker
Vaughan Pratt and JCH Max – you are determined to distort this. [Trenberth's reaction to the recent "lack of warming"] No distortion necessary. As you both seem to have been a bit confused, let me set...
View ArticleComment on Public engagement on climate change by Paul S
Richard Tol is a social scientist / economist specialising in climate policy. The public policy debate is precisely his area of expertise.
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Louise But why would they wish to lie in this way? Correct. Makes much more sense – career wise – for them to “lie the other way” – right? Max
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Rob You may be correct in stating that few US voters can “communicate quickly and correctly why the ‘consensus’ …position is flawed” Many might simply state “uncertainty”, referring to both the...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by dallas
Louise, have you ever considered that some people are skeptical because there is a need for skepticism? Global warming theory is not complete. It cannot be predictive until it is complete enough...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by David Bailey
Brad, I think I could sum up your comment as, “Leave the system as it is, it is not too bad!”. I’d say that if it causes our electricity grid to be reconfigured in a hugely expensive and pointless way,...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Robert
Can you (or anyone else) point out (provide a link to) a single paper that has described the great net harms that humanity will incur as a result of AGW, that is believed to be an unbiased and valid...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Robert
“You write:” No, I didn’t write that. Lying by the second word, huh? Impressive.
View ArticleComment on Public engagement on climate change by RobB
“It seems to me almost a prior condition of better engagement with the public is that there should be better engagement between scientists.” I could not agree more. In the rare instances that...
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
At best that is an asinine conclusion, devoid of any value, except auto-titilation
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Steven Mosher If all the past data was lost we would still have physics which tells us that adding GHGs leads to a warmer planet. The real debate is over how much. energy focused away from that debate...
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
“But briefly, backradiation from atmosphere to surface is less than radiation from surface to atmosphere.” Ok “Backradiation exists, it is radiation from the cooler atmosphere to the warmer surface,...
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
I know the point you are trying to make. I am showing that your point is incorrect.
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
You said “0.04*F per year.” I said 0.026 C total. Not per year; total. It’s the UNITS that is the crucial difference. Further discussion belongs in the response to your previous comment.
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Yes! Finally you understand tt! Never stop being skeptical. That’s a good start.
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
Fifty years will erase the modern world as we know it.
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
bob, argon is just a trace gas – insignificant. I don’t take references, until people recognise that Global warming is phony – climatic changes are real. If you can find any drivel on my site, you...
View Article