Comment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
Chris, if we keep adding the same amount of heat per year, we will continue to raise the temperature by that amount per year. Perhaps I’m missing your point
View ArticleComment on Congressional Climate Briefing to Push “End of Climate Change...
If radiation prevents any further rise in temperature why are we concerned at all?
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by WebHubTelescope
<blockquote>I have not heard or seen of a statistical treatment such as this and it seems a perfectly understandable and legitimate approach, even at the ‘informed layperson’...
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
NW, Appeal to God? The Bible tells us that He uses earthquakes as a warning of coming judgement. Plot this: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/historical.php Maybe it is ‘natural’, you be the...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by curryja
Thanks for these links. I’ve taken a quick look at your post, looks interesting. Interest in a new thread discussing this?
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
David - I have to wonder if your taste in wine is influenced by confirmation bias. Statistics would suggest that it is: http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2007/11/the_subjectivity_of_wine.php That said, if...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Chris Ho-Stuart
They <i>have</i> all been assessed. Which one of those do you think is not sufficiently well assessed so as to leave the matter of the major source of recent warming unclear? That's a...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Big Oyl
“This is the sort of confusion you expect when your primary source material is “john-daly.com” rather than the actual scientific papers being discussed, as well as the discussions of those papers in...
View ArticleComment on Slaying a greenhouse dragon by Bill Smith
Mr. Skolnick you are some kind of a Stalker. When a person spends vast amounts of time tracking and following a single person and then hurling vast amounts of puss and vitriol at that person they are a...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Girma
Fred Here is an example. The physical explanation based on ocean heat content and the negative constraints imposed by the Stefan-Boltzmann law (precluding runaway type climate feedbacks) is what shows...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by gbaikie
“But let me try an experiment re your comment: There is a great resource for long lists of papers under various sub-topics to do with climate change. Here it is; http://agwobserver.wordpress.com/index/...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Girma
Fred I agree that you are an excellent story teller. However, regarding AGW, the story may be wrong.
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
I know its subjective, but Wine Spectator in my experience is trustworthy, more trustworthy than the climate science literature. Fred might not fare too well though because I would also invite my...
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
Would the climate stopped changing, if it wasn’t any industrial revolution? Overpopulation will destroy everything green in nature, not CO2. Before 1850′s CO2 in the air was to criticality low level,...
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
Martha, for Pete’s sake, just write your own paper.
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Girma
More recently, people like Manabe, James Hansen, Wally Broecker (who coined the term “global warming”) have positioned themselves into the future history books. http://bit.ly/iyscaK Into the history...
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
Tomas, your comments are appreciated, even if my lack of background in dynamical systems has left me unclear as to the basis of some of your conclusions. My intuition tells me that the study of chaotic...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond: Part II by Peter Davies
Indeed. Humans are as natural as any other organisism. Sure we are more powerful and can do a lot of damage to the environment but it is still natural!
View ArticleComment on Heresy and the creation of monsters by Chad Wozniak
Dear Judith: Thanks for fighting the good fight against dogma and political propaganda in science, and expopsing the errors of the GHG scaremongers as you have. Again the bottom line is that the human...
View ArticleComment on Proc. Roy. Soc. Special Issue on ‘Handling Uncertainty in Science’...
“Without fossil fuel, earth can sustain 1,5 billion people – have they decided what to do with the other 5 billion?” I wonder if that is correct. I wonder what max pop the world could have without...
View Article