Comment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Bryan
Chris Ho-Stuart says “I showed how it applies to a neutral atmosphere in this comment. above (Nov 29). I explained again with emphasis on the neutral dry atmosphere in this comment” No you didn’t, as...
View ArticleComment on Discussion thread: Durban, emails by andrew adams
kuhnkat, I assume you are in the US? I’m in the UK and so am pretty familiar with the totality of the BBC’s coverage of scientific issues over the last 30 years, and our government’s approach to them....
View ArticleComment on Discussion thread: Durban, emails by Jim in SC
seems as if in preparation for Durban there has been an increase in climate related stories in the mainstream press. A quick look at Google trends shows the increase started back in August and are...
View ArticleComment on Shifts, phase-locked state and chaos in climate data by DocMartyn
That way madness lays. The problem is ‘spurious correlations’. If you have 1,000,000 data sets, looking at completely unrelated phenomena, there is a very good chance that one will observe a lovely...
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Chris Ho-Stuart
MODTRAN is given as an example of a well established tool that uses the same layering method as we do — or indeed anyone wanting a realistic calculation from basic physics of surface temperatures for...
View ArticleComment on Discussion thread: Durban, emails by PhilJourdan
M. carey | November 30, 2011 at 6:48 pm | Good God, you hacker backers know no shame. Just for your own edification, you might want to show where anyone is “backing hackers”. Indeed, other than...
View ArticleComment on Discussion thread: Durban, emails by PhilJourdan
<blockquote>Fear of punishment from liberals may be a symptom of mental illness.</blockquote> or to be more precise, a conditioned reflex.
View ArticleComment on Discussion thread: Durban, emails by PhilJourdan
M. carey | November 30, 2011 at 9:28 pm | kuhnkat, reading between the lines, it sounds like I may have convinced you the hacker should come out of the closet. I want the truth, the whole truth, and...
View ArticleComment on Shifts, phase-locked state and chaos in climate data by Peter Davies
The correct application of scientific method would be to develop theories and suitable sets of hypotheses (based on these theories) for testing on the available datasets PRIOR to any further study of...
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Ken Coffman
As a grizzled old electrical engineer, I am a one-flow, one-fluid person. As long as the accounting is done carefully, the results from a one-fluid analysys and a two-fluid analysis will be the same. I...
View ArticleComment on Science communication by Robert
The allegation of gatekeeping implies you have determined that certain people have an allegiance to something and are excluding outsiders. So you are evaluating allegiances among scientists, but not...
View ArticleComment on Science communication by Jim of CP
Robert | December 9, 2011 at 4:52 pm “One thing they cannot do is reveal statistical manipulation in climate-change studies that require a PhD in a related field to understand. ” Steve McIntyre and...
View ArticleComment on Science communication by P.E.
OOPS. That wasn’t supposed to embed like that.
View ArticleComment on Science communication by randomengineer
It’s the job of the smart people to help instruct the not. That’s true, and precisely why everything that affects Joe in an increasingly technological society needs to be framed accordingly, and...
View ArticleComment on Science communication by Bad Andrew
“needs to be framed accordingly” I disagree that it needs to be “framed.” It needs to be “explained.” Andrew
View ArticleComment on Science communication by Robert
You illustrate a major cognitive problem with climate deniers and deniers/conspiracy theorists of all strips: If a source doesn’t accept your kookie beliefs, then they are not trustworthy (and can’t...
View ArticleComment on Science communication by Captain Dallas (Fish Beware!)
P.E., you mean like the Scientist that invented the new battery technology that didn’t work, but with A123, started making Li+ batteries for vehicles and expanded its US operations to get $105million...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Science communication by randomengineer
<i>AIT in schools</i> Nice example. Joshua = pwned.
View Article