Comment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Anteros
I won’t speculate for Beesaman, but my contention would be the same as I gave upthread – that cancer is rather universally seen as a bummer, whereas a warmer climate is not. Some of us think it may be...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Michael
“Oreskes was the boss, carbon-hog face of the latest IPCC carbon pig-out bash in Durban…” That’s as far as I read.
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Joshua
Anteros - She wants the ‘gravity’ of climate change to be settled in the way that an ‘anthropogenic’ influence is settled – While I think you make some valid points in your post, this point confuses...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Joshua
Anteros - See my comment below. Also, another question. Suppose in the early stages of reporting about the link between smoking and lung cancer, the researches had accompanied their science with...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Joshua
mike - Have you had your coffee yet? Do you think that the writer of an op-ed expressing a strong “skeptical” opinion would deserve the same level of abuse?
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by lolwot
“The fact that global warming ended by 1998 and the fact that the world has been in fact cooling since 2002 trumps any consensus of open minded people claiming human caused global.” Not at all because...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by lolwot
ha I think that tapping sound was Micheal nailing your double standards
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by cwon14
I never realized what a personality cult, warmist or skeptic, right or left, existed here until you revealed yourself DM. Here we have a link to a tin foil hat, eco-leftist extremist (Oreskes) and you...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Eli Rabett
Be careful, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/23/climate-sceptic-lawson-thinktank-funding" rel="nofollow">you might get an answer</a>
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by manacker
ceteris non paribus <strong>[corrected formatting – please ignore earlier post]</strong> You state: <blockquote>you cannot say that the warming stopped since 2000</blockquote>...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by hastur
Max, I can’t speak for Bob, but I’ll play anyway. How many metrics show statistically significant warming since 2001? This is a meaningless question as the period is too short to give a statistically...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Eli Rabett
Oh goody, someone who <a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/04/fred-seitz-is-not-as-pure-as-driven.html" rel="nofollow">doesn't know</a> about <a...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by lolwot
“How many metrics show statistically significant warming since 2001?” How many should?
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by John Kannarr
Isn’t this the same Naomi Oreskes who wrote about the 50 years’ of “consensus science” that ignored evidence for plate tectonics and continental drift? I would have thought she had learned something...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by lolwot
please stop being so rude and also please stop revealing the plans for world communism
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Michael
Did you see the “raw data” mosher??????
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Michael
Yes, there has always been cancer.
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by manacker
ceteris ex paribus The back-and-forth has gotten a bit long, so I’ve posted this here. You state that it is “up to the scientists” to determine what is “empirical evidence”. Wrong. It is “up to the...
View ArticleComment on Open-mindedness is the wrong(?) approach by Michael
Awesome – random isn’t sure about smoking causing cancer. Denialist bingo indeed!
View Article