Comment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Labmunkey
I’m confused- i still don’t see how either of these lend credance to the cAGW theory. They could still both be entirely natural. Am i missing something? Or is it just that these sheets were supposed to...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by harold...
Please don’t call me Harry! My nicknames are Hop, Hoppy, Hopper or Mouse Ears! You sound like a greenie who claim humans are the scourge of the earth and should be eliminated.
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Labmunkey
” If our interpretation of the data is so weak that it cannot be challenged what is it worth? ” Quote of the week, An excellent motto for a scientist to live by.
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Neil Fisher
“Observe the amount of the time the anomaly stays around zero upto around 2003 and how much it remains below it after that.” Huh. Perhaps if I make comments about 30 years as the minimum in climate...
View ArticleComment on Reasoning about floods and climate change by RobB
Chief – the link is to the same paper as the one in the comment above? Too many G&Ts?
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Simon...
Ohhhhh.. Romm is SOOOO busted.
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Labmunkey
Yeah i almost feel sorry for him. It’s quite easy to get caught up in a new ‘story’, but this one has a real case of foot meet mouth to it. Now lets see him try to dig his way ‘up’…..
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by sharper00
“Huh. Perhaps if I make comments about 30 years as the minimum in climate studies, you might think about retracting this comment “ The 30 year norm defines the current climate state, it’s not a magic...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Jim Cripwell
May I draw people’s attention to http://icecap.us/images/uploads/The_failures_part_1.pdf Here Joe D’Aleo points out that AGW is not” global”. Antarctica tends to be cooling; the southern hemisphere is...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by HR
I’m excited about that data too but I think we only get 4 or 5 years of data and then there’s all the fun of calibrating it. I think expecting it to settle the issue is going a step too far but I agree...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by HR
Judith, What’s the best sources of ice data for the 1930′s? I’ve been curious about how the ice looked in the 1930′s but have failed to find any good data. I even wrote to the Canadian Ice Service who...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Joe Lalonde
Judith, A fascinating area of study is speed and time. For example: If the crust under the ocean took a month to shove 10 meters on a fault line, then the oceans would dissipate that change as the...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Joe Lalonde
Jim, Tying climate science globally is a fool hearty adventure at best. The diameter of the rotating equator is the biggest areas of mass and all other areas are subsequently smaller. This planet is...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by HR
Polyakov has heaps of interesting stuff on his website. http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/people/igor I did a little bit of climate sciencist pestering last year after reading some of his work and asked him...
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by barn E....
When it comes to historical temp reconstructions, I’m wondering why there are not more references to the work of Dr. Patterson and his team from U of Sask. Or anyone else using oxygen isotopes (mainly,...
View ArticleComment on Inconvenient truths about energy policy by Dallas
The East coast has a fair number coal plants by salt water for barge delivery of coal. Not enough to make a huge dent, but it may be of some use. Higher efficiency with syn-fuel production makes more...
View ArticleComment on Inconvenient truths about energy policy by David L. Hagen
wade good question. The commercially important conversion is from 2 CO2 to 2 CO + O2 – See Sandia’s Sunlight to Petrol program. It appears to need a little lower energy than 2 H2O to 2H2 + O2. The cost...
View ArticleComment on Inconvenient truths about energy policy by Rutt Bridges
Of course, Ian… here it is: http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/sustainability/pdf/CCS_Assessing_the_Economics.pdf I share some suspicions about McKinsey having dealt with some of their experts in...
View ArticleComment on Inconvenient truths about energy policy by Fred Moolten
Actually, the 0.48 C reduction in temperature rise would be an equilibrium value, and the figure at year 2060 would be less.
View ArticleComment on Pondering the Arctic Ocean. Part I: Climate Dynamics by Chief...
‘That said there is a LOT of nonsense about the PDO. People like CPC are tracking PDO on a monthly basis but it is highly correlated with ENSO. Most of what they are seeing is the change in ENSO not...
View Article