I note in NARUC’s debate agenda the continued and deliberate use of slob terminology like “global warming” and “climate change”. Are they happening? Are they real? Well, duh.
You would think after all the billions, all the conferences, all the publishing, that these people would be willing to come up with a name for the problem they raise.
But asking if “climate change” is real just isn’t the same as asking if “significant and global human-caused climate disruption” is real. The second question leaves no back or side doors and it can actually be answered one way or another. No fun.
The climatariat say they want to use common terms in an “accepted” scientific sense. What they really want is wriggle room and slither space.
