Jim, one study in one area is definitely not definitive on what the effect is of relatively rapid process (whatever you want to call). I don’t think we know that species can adapt to these circumstances and there is a lot of evidence that it has the potential to do damage to certain species and ecosystems.
And for a look at that evidence you can go here You can read some abstracts..
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=ocean+acidification&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C19&as_sdtp=
He actually always contributed mostly to Democrats. Looking at his history it is hard to see why he is running as a republican except using the story of the lamp post and lost quarter, that is where he can see the way.
It is a useful issue and we shall see if others will follow the path he pioneered. Hard to see how the US can absorb most of Mexico and latin america without crashing like Greece giving the welfare and school expenses of the undocumented.
A seven time bankruptee with an obnoxious presence will flame out soon enough. Wonder which of the alternates in the race will pick up the issue. Likely Cruz or Walker who have both been successful in demanding jobs.
In fact 25% of Mexico population is in the US. Mostly uneducated and relying on the taxpayer for subsidies.
A mess like Italy and the boat people from north africa.
Scott
Try running an iron lung machine exclusively on wind or solar. Or a steel mill.
> You used the imprecise term first.
Begging the question with an inaccurate claim, Puppet. On this thread, Jim D used the concept first. Also, he followed the accepted terminology. Puppets don’t dictate how the lichurchur evolve.
Speaking of evolution, let’s correct another inaccurate statement:
First use of “acidification” as opposed to reduced alkalinity, appears to be in 1 2003 article by Ken Caldera.
The concept dates back at least to Revelle. Op. Cit..
***
No mention of Nick’s comments on that thread, e.g.:
Acidification is a technical term from chemistry, and that’s what it means. Your claim that acidifying only applies if pH<7 is no less technical. The difference is, it’s wrong.
http://judithcurry.com/2013/07/19/ocean-acidification-discussion-thread/#comment-348340
No mention of Pekka’s comments either.
Wonder why?
I hope my other post gets out of moderation but he did use the forceful you know what act to describe illegal immigrants (the r word). It made me think about the stories of blacks being targeted for raping white woman back in the Jim Crow days. What a dummy..
> guardian headline 2009
But journalists.
***
> (Hardcover)
But Jim.
***
Now, my turn:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fjudithcurry.com+cagw
More than 1900 hits on Judy’s alone.
Jim2
I read the immigration stances of several Republican candidates and all of those are advocating closing the borders. The list includes Rubio, Bush, Cruz, and Fiorina. Note: I use the term “closing the borders” to mean allowing border crossings only at ports of entry and allowing entry only to citizens and legal immigrants.
Richard
The reason this paper is called recursive fury is that it is about the response to his first paper which itself found those who had conspiracy ideation also included many global warming skeptics. In the blog response to that paper that they examined, they found ironically, a lot of climate skeptical people thought that the paper itself was part of a broader conspiracy. Just goes to show. Now it is going to show again in the response to the recursive fury paper. Doubly-recursive. He can make a series out of it.
I think it has more to do with biological activity than atmospheric concentration (really the interaction, but a lot of it could have been due to clearing skies in the 80s and 90s among other things).
Joseph: “Who knows they are unreliable?”
Anyone who is capable of reading a graph, of course.
“Analogously to the alarming medical headlines warning future bad outcomes associated with ordinary daily habits….” – JC
How deluded can you get??
The message is exactly the opposite – avoid X and improve your health. It’s really a case of relentless optimism.
Did someone say ‘ ideology makes you stupid’?
“Spiegelhalter raises an important point: the manufactured and enforced consensus on climate change results in an unknown amount of evidence that we are not hearing about that would challenge the consensus.” – JC
Having become an infrequent visitor to Judith’s Weak Tea House, I’ve come to realise that there is a ‘boiling frog’ effect in play from regular exposure to the ineffable stupidities (such as above) found here.
Dipping your toe back in the pond, it hits you just how bonkers Judith has become, with the ideology-driven nonsense, quasi-pop-psych drivel and the immersion in tabloid-style hard-right ‘news’.
Turbulent Eddie: “they’re not saturated with CO2.”
You are ignoring Dalton’s law of partial pressures, not to mention Henry’s law.
William Gail, past AMS president has a view about the contradiction between the maybe-nature-did-it attitude and the Congressional lack of desire to know more about how nature did it by cutting funding for climate science.
http://www.thecalifornian.com/story/opinion/2015/07/07/lost-climate-arguments/29822745/
@scotts4sf | July 14, 2015 at 8:09 pm |
The allegation that Trump has donated more to Dimowits is a lie. Like all businesses, he has contributed to both parties. But, in sum, he has donated more to Republicans.
From the article:
Republicans Democrats
Federal $703,900 $327,600
State $257,240 $257,250
Total $961,140 $584,850
@richardswarthout | July 14, 2015 at 8:53 pm |
I read the “political stances” of the last crop of Republicans that ran for office. The ones that said they would control immigration, reel in Obamacare, and other conservative-leaning promises. They lied. I no longer trust what they say. Although, Scott Walker has a good record, so I tend to believe him.
I suppose the news got out about the sanctuary city chuting here in CA. Once again, CA leads the way. Press 1 for Engish.
So, other than ad homs, do you have any evidence Dr. Curry is wrong? I think not.
Huh?
“Why is helping corporations to be able to hire more people in the USA bad?”
Read some Pat Buchanan. Or school your children in how to live in the third world.
