Don’t be discouraged by the lack of ideas to counter the consensus. Judith is sure something will show up any time now.
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Jim D
↧
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by nickels
I like Trump because:
1) he took on the great cancer of Western society, political correctness (exposing corporations as its ally)
2) he will protect the US. No more apologetics. We are the most phenomenal nation anywhere, anyone that had a problem with that can pay double
3) immigration: a cultural and economic wound if epic proportion
4) trade: another gusher
I think he needs another issue or two, something cultural. Not sure if hell get one or not.
I almost gurantee you when he finds out the crap going on with consensus its going to be ‘youre fired.’
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Willard
Here, Jim D:
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Willard
We shall overcomb.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Michael
It’s not even that Joseph.
Spiegelhalter is only talking about what makes it into the ‘news’.
Judith takes a hop skip and jump of illogic to turn that into a comment about the scientific consensus.
Just bonkers.
↧
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Jim D
The estimated forcing of a Maunder Minimum is only about 20% of the CO2 forcing to date and less than 10% of the projected forcing by 2100. It would make a small dent in a large trend.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Ragnaar
“The trend didn’t happen in an instant: 30 years ago, many feared the southwest Minnesota town would become a ghost town. Instead immigrants flooded in – and stayed. One weekend last month, the local St. Mary’s Catholic Church hosted 14 baptisms in one standing. All Hispanic.”
http://www.twincities.com/ci_18913796
Parts of rural Minnesota are dying. Enter the immigrants. In lily white Minnesota a nice transformation may be occurring.
“After decades of growing pains, families have steadily replaced transients. They’ve bought homes and started businesses.”
Commerce, probably with little government planning results. Probably without government subsidies.
“Walk down 10th Street – Worthington’s main downtown drag – and you’ll notice mostly minority-owned businesses. Panaderia Mi Tierra, the town’s only bakery, is bustling in the mornings.”
The commerce is a result of government not keeping them out I think.
The point of trying to send some people from Worthington back to Mexico is lost on me. Trump missed on this one but he’ll probably attract some with certain views.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Mike Flynn
Jim D,
It appears that four and a half billion years of CO2 “forcing” resulted in the Earth cooling, when CO2 levels were far higher than now.
One or two hundred years of the same “forcing”, with far lower CO2 levels, is now heating the Earth. Really?
And your cure for your CO2 phobia is to reduce CO2 levels so that all plant life dies? This sounds like “We had to destroy the village to save it”, but on a far grander scale – destroy all life on Earth, to save Gaia. Yeah, right. That’ll work, for sure!
Are you also intending to reduce levels of H2O? You realise that H2O kills, don’t you? Best apply the precautionary principle, and get rid of it all, eh, before more children die.
Bah, humbug.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Horst Graben (@Graben_Horst)
Jim2: sure, but remember it every time you hear about near-shore acidification that gets blamed on global warming.
↧
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by bedeverethewise
saw this on Bishop Hill. Very interesting and hilarious and sad and telling. Worth watching.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by micro6500
” I suggested folks do their own damn science.”
I do.
“How when and where you choose to publish.. meh.. not as critical”
Now which is it, “publish” or “meh”
Technically it is, plus I am, and it was used as a proof of concept for what later turned out to be a multi billion dollar global business.
David Springer, does that count?
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Horst Graben (@Graben_Horst)
Another example of the end of debate and the uselessness of paleoclimatology:
http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/11/95/2015/cpd-11-95-2015-print.pdf
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by Jim D
↧
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by beththeserf
Faustino, I read yr lead letter In ‘The Australian ‘ newspaper,
14th July. Good commentary on an uncertain future and the
futility of policies that seek to manipulate the future. bts
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by climatereason
jimD
Hoping for a rely to this
http://judithcurry.com/2015/07/13/the-siddhartha-heuristic/#comment-718014
tonyb
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by beththeserf
Tony ‘hope springs eternal’
regardin’ messagin’ infernal!
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by beththeserf
… and ‘ massage-in’ ‘
↧
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by thomaswfuller2
Actually, the consensus will counter itself.
Greg Laden: There is zero room for debate on climate science.
Greg Laden: Sensitivity is subject to debate.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by thomaswfuller2
I like Trump because I’m a Democrat.
↧
Comment on The Siddhartha heuristic by thomaswfuller2
JimD, you really shouldn’t defend that piece of garbage. Really. It hurts your credibility.
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
