Web
I’m beginning to think you have a basic reading disorder.
You wrote:
Increase of greenhouse gases by 87%?
Co2 only has increased by 40%. Notice how Manacker has to stand up for a fellow skeptic no matter how ridiculous his claim is.
I did NOT write “increase of greenhouse gases by 87%”.
What I wrote, based on IPCC RF estimates for the various GHGs adjusted from 2005 to 2011. that the temperature increase from the increased concentrations of TOTAL GHGs was around 87% of the temperature increase to be expected from 2xCO2, rather than equal, as Lindzen had stated (so he was slightly off).
This was in response to a query by Robert regarding the.validity of Lindzen’s statement and a remark from our host that it sounded incorrect (although she had not checked it out).
Turns out it’s not exactly correct, but not that far off, either.
Get it?
Can you understand it now?
Not really too tough if you simply pay attention to what’s written.
Max